略论纳西族与理塘巴塘之关系

发布时间：2018-05-17 23:22

  本文选题：纳西族 + 理塘　； 参考：《中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：历史上藏羌彝走廊的民族关系复杂而多有变迁。过去学界论及巴塘、理塘和纳西族的关系,提及的多是明代木氏土司的势力抵达这两个地方之后的事。其实巴塘理塘和纳西族的关系,可以追溯到更早的时期。根据史载和口碑资料,纳西语与史载的白狼国关系密切,汉藏文史书所记的藏族最古四氏族中的"穆"部落与"白狼"部落之间的关系,也提供了研究纳西族与巴塘理塘两地关系的新线索。明代,纳西族与巴塘理塘在经济和文化方面有过诸多交流,历史上的"撒打"(三赕)即说明丽江和巴塘的关系十分密切。通过个案实证分析,有利于深化对藏族与纳西族历史关系以及藏羌彝走廊的民族历史关系的研究。
[Abstract]:In the history of Tibetan Qiang Yi Corridor, the ethnic relations are complicated and have many vicissitudes. The relationship between Batang, Litang and Naxi was discussed in the past, mostly after the arrival of the Mushi forces in the Ming Dynasty. In fact, the relationship between Batang Litang and the Naxi can be traced back to the earlier period. According to historical records and word-of-mouth data, Naxi language is closely related to Shizhai's White Wolf country, and the relationship between the "Mu" and "White Wolf" tribes among the four most ancient Tibetan clans recorded in the Han and Tibetan literary and historical books. It also provides a new clue to study the relationship between Naxi and Batang Litang. In Ming Dynasty, the Naxi nationality and Batang Litang had many economic and cultural exchanges. The historical "Sandan" shows that the relationship between Lijiang and Batang is very close. The empirical analysis is helpful to deepen the research on the historical relationship between Tibetan and Naxi and the ethnic historical relationship in the Tibetan Qiang Yi Corridor.
【作者单位】： 云南省社会科学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“藏羌彝文化走廊建设研究”(项目编号:16ZDA155)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K28
，

本文编号：1903332