多重宇宙论并接的交互主体性阐释——兼论“做”民族志

发布时间：2018-11-28 13:46

【摘要】：阐释法曾被用以应对科学民族志方法论危机。它取得了部分成功,但也给激进后现代主义留下了认识论上解构的后门,使民族志变为"写"文化甚至走向不可知论。完善它,须明确人类学家与田野对象为交互主体,语言为介质,其本体则是并接的多重宇宙论。当代人类学"本体论转向"强调多重宇宙论比较,但不能武断"异文合并"以求纯化。阐释实为同一世界多元文化主体的话语权实践,仅从认识论上强调"裸呈"田野对象叙事或不同主体视角,并不能消除权力不对等。在此意义上,民族志并非"写"而是"做"出来的,"做"得好坏,不仅与不同主体的认识角度、水平有关,更与阐释的权力实践有关。
[Abstract]:The hermeneutic method was used to deal with the methodological crisis of scientific ethnography. It has achieved some success, but it also left the radical postmodernism with the back door of deconstruction in epistemology, which turned ethnography into "writing" culture and even to agnosticism. To perfect it, it is necessary to make clear that anthropologists and field objects are interactive subjects, language is the medium, and its ontology is multifold cosmology. The ontological turn of contemporary anthropology emphasizes the comparison of multiple cosmology, but it cannot be arbitrarily purified. It is not possible to eliminate the unequal power of power by explaining the practice of discourse right which is actually a multicultural subject in the same world. Only emphasizing the narrative of "bare presentation" field object or different subject angle of view from epistemology can not eliminate the unequal power. In this sense, ethnography is not "written" but "done", and the quality of "doing" is not only related to the understanding angle and level of different subjects, but also to the power practice of interpretation.
【作者单位】：中山大学人类学系;
【分类号】：C912.4

【相似文献】