分权与制衡:理解ICANN问责制方案

发布时间：2018-03-26 18:06

  本文选题：监管权　切入点：地址分配　出处：《中国信息安全》2016年08期

【摘要】：正自美国商务部2014年3月14日宣布放弃IANA监管权,并由互联互联网名称和数字地址分配机构(ICANN)牵头制定IANA移交方案以来,移交方案的讨论无疑是过去两年来全球互联网社群关注和讨论的焦点。然而,很多人忽略了在移交方案之外,还有一个平行但可能更加重要的流程—加强ICANN问责制方案(通常也简称为CCWG方案)。CCWG方案的重要性在于,它是移交方案生效的前提和基础。换句话说,如果ICANN和互联网社群没有就CCWG方案达成一致意见,那么耗时两年多讨论形成的移交方案将不
[Abstract]:Since March 14, 2014, the United States Department of Commerce has renounced its IANA regulatory authority and is being led by the Internet name and Digital address Distribution Agency (ICANN) to develop the IANA handover program. The discussion of the handover program has undoubtedly been the focus of attention and discussion in the global Internet community over the past two years. However, many people have neglected to go outside the handover program. There is also a parallel but possibly more important process-- the importance of strengthening the ICANN Accountability Programme (often referred to as the CCWG solution) is that it is the prerequisite and the basis for the handover program to take effect. In other words, If the ICANN and the Internet community do not agree on a CCWG solution, then the handover scheme, which took more than two years to discuss, will not
【作者单位】： 互联网域名系统工程研究中心;
【分类号】：D771.2;TP393.4
，

本文编号：1668968