试析全球化与民族国家关系中的悖论

发布时间：2018-04-09 02:01

本文选题：全球化　切入点：全球治理　出处：《浙江师范大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 自人类社会进入信息时代以来,经济、政治、文化的跨国界交往日益活跃和频繁。全球化呈现出空前的速度、广度和深度。这种复杂过程要求更多的沟通、协调和管理。于是,更多的超国家组织、次国家组织应运而生。原本拥有绝对、唯一主权的民族国家,在这种网络化的全球治理兴起后,虽然仍作为国际政治中一个重要主体而存在,但是其传统的权威地位受到了巨大冲击;原有的职能也或增或减,发生了重大改变。并且,维系民族国家的许多精神与文化特质,诸如传统、语言、文字和物质的、非物质的文化遗产等,也在交往融合中面临着边缘化甚至丧失的危险。在这种重要的时代大转型时期,全球化与民族国家之间的关系成为人们思考、探索未来社会发展道路的一项意义深远的重大课题。回顾历史,我们发现全球化与民族国家之间存在着千丝万缕的联系,其中的悖论更是引入深思。早期的全球化与民族国家之间存在悖论,早期两者之间的关系与当代两者之间的关系存在悖论,并且当代全球化与民族国家关系之中也存在种种悖论。全球化与民族国家正是在相互推动与相互牵制中一路走来。本文在第一部分对全球化、国家、悖论作了清晰的界定。第二部分阐述了马克思主义创立者的全球化视野和民族化理论。第三部分重点探求了早期全球化与民族国家关系中的悖论。论文指出,早期全球化既存在“全球化与民族国家的相互促进”,也存在“扩张与衰落,压迫与复兴”的悖论。第四部分论述了当代全球化与民族国家关系中的悖论,阐释了“全球治理与国家权威”、“全球化与国家职能”和“普遍价值认同的要求与民族文化的保护”三个问题。第五部分论述了全球化与中国的和平崛起,论证了立足民族振兴,建构和谐世界的合理性和必要性。论文试图通过悖论的思维方式更好地认识全球化与民族国家间的关系,以期从中求得历史进程中的某些规律性因素。全球化与民族国家关系中的悖论给予我们深刻的启示:全球化与民族国家之间存在的种种悖论是历史进程中出现的客观结果,蕴含了世界“和而不同”的深刻内涵。在全球化进程中也存在由于国家、民族和人性的“自利”而产生的不利于人的全面发展和人类社会总体进步的因素。在这个全球化与民族国家矛盾纠结的时刻,在这个全球化与民族国家都有其存在必要性和合理性而同时人类又未能对未来美好生活达成最终共识的时刻,正如马克思、列宁、毛泽东、邓小平以及当代中国领导人等一百多年来一再清醒认识的那样,以世界各民族的独立和自强作为推动有利于全人类的全球化的重要条件,应该是我们应对全球化的正确战略选择。对于中国来说,我们必须坚持以前辈们的正确理论为指导,做到“立足民族振兴,构建和谐世界”,在维护中华民族的利益的同时也推动全人类的和谐共存。
[Abstract]:Since the human society entered the information age, economic, political and cultural exchanges across national boundaries have become increasingly active and frequent.Globalization presents unprecedented speed, breadth and depth.This complex process requires more communication, coordination and management.As a result, more supranational organizations, sub-state organizations came into being.After the rise of this kind of network global governance, the nation state, which originally had absolute and sole sovereignty, still existed as an important subject in international politics, but its traditional authoritative position was greatly impacted.The original functions were also increased or decreased, and a major change took place.Moreover, many spiritual and cultural characteristics, such as tradition, language, writing and material, intangible cultural heritage, which support the nation-state, are also facing the risk of marginalization or even loss in the process of communication and integration.In this important period of great transformation, the relationship between globalization and nation-state has become a significant topic for people to think about and explore the way of social development in the future.Looking back on history, we find that there are inextricably links between globalization and nation-state, and the paradox is even more thought-provoking.There are paradoxes between the early globalization and the nation-state, the relationship between the early two and the contemporary one, and there are also various paradoxes in the relationship between the contemporary globalization and the nation-state.Globalization and nation-state are all along the way in pushing and restraining each other.In the first part of this paper, a clear definition of globalization, state, paradox.The second part expounds the globalization vision and nationalization theory of the founder of Marxism.The third part focuses on the paradox in the relationship between early globalization and nation-state.The paper points out that the early globalization had the paradox of "globalization and the mutual promotion of nation-state" and "expansion and decline, oppression and renaissance".The fourth part discusses the paradox in the relationship between contemporary globalization and nation-state, and explains three problems: "Global Governance and State Authority", "Globalization and State function" and "the requirement of Universal value identity and the Protection of National Culture".The fifth part discusses globalization and the peaceful rise of China, and demonstrates the rationality and necessity of building a harmonious world based on national rejuvenation.This paper attempts to better understand the relationship between globalization and nation-states through the paradoxical way of thinking in order to find out some regular factors in the course of history.The paradox in the relationship between globalization and nation-state gives us profound enlightenment: the paradox between globalization and nation-state is the objective result of the historical process and contains the profound connotation of "harmony but difference" in the world.In the process of globalization, there are also factors which are not conducive to the overall development of human beings and the overall progress of human society because of the "self-interest" of nation, nation and human nature.At this time of conflict between globalization and nation-state, at a time when globalization and nation-state have their own necessity and rationality while human beings fail to reach a final consensus on a better life in the future, as Marx, Lenin,Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and contemporary Chinese leaders have repeatedly and soberly realized for more than a hundred years that the independence and self-improvement of all ethnic groups in the world are the important conditions for promoting globalization that is beneficial to all mankind.It should be the right strategic choice for us to deal with globalization.For China, we must adhere to the guidance of the correct theory of our predecessors, "based on the rejuvenation of the nation, build a harmonious world", while safeguarding the interests of the Chinese nation, but also promote the harmonious coexistence of all mankind.
【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D562

【引证文献】