试论印度尼西亚繁荣公正党在民主参与中的策略嬗变

发布时间：2018-05-08 03:03

本文选题：繁荣公正党 + 温和化　；参考：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文的研究问题是“2003年以来，印度尼西亚（以下简称印尼）繁荣公正党为什么进行了温和化转变？”。经过印尼民主改革时期三次大选，在伊斯兰政党中，只有繁荣公正党能够达成得票率和国会席位不断增长的成绩，成为国会第四大党。通过研究繁荣公正党的策略可以加深对印尼政治伊斯兰的理解。从世界伊斯兰政治来看，在埃及、土耳其等国家，与繁荣公正党采取相似策略的伊斯兰政党在近期选举中也取得了成功。国内外的经验事实表明这个问题在理论上既具有独特性，也具有一般性。本文采用文献法、基础的统计方法和个案研究的方法。文中提出了“两个步骤——四个角度”的分析框架。第一步骤是设定温和化的定义并操作化概念。在此基础上检验繁荣公正党的活动是否满足温和化的定义。只有验证了该党的活动确实具有温和化的性质，才能够进一步加以分析。第二步骤，本文首先分析了繁荣公正党温和化转变的性质，而后从目的、领导结构和意识形态三个方面解释温和化的原因。结论认为：（1）繁荣公正党温和化的性质既是实质性的也是实用主义的。通过繁荣公正党的案例印证了伊斯兰政党的“双轨”路线。（2）温和化动机可能是为了更快的融入民主政治体制，在制度内获得更多的政治资源，而伊斯兰化目标则间接的受益于温和化转变。（3）政党领导层结构向实用主义派倾斜是温和化的直接动力。（4）埃及穆斯林兄弟会思想和教育运动在印尼的发展史是温和化的意识形态来源，，但是社会伊斯兰化的目标可能为该党今后能否保持温和化路线划上问号。文章最后提出实用主义目标和伊斯兰化目标是一对相互依赖又排斥的矛盾体，是繁荣公正党未来发展需要解决的核心问题。
[Abstract]:The research question of this paper is: why did the Prosperity and Justice Party of Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as Indonesia) moderate since 2003? After three general elections during the period of democratic reform in Indonesia, only the Prosperity and Justice Party was able to achieve the result of gaining votes and increasing seats in parliament, becoming the fourth largest party in parliament. By studying the strategy of the Prosperity and Justice Party, we can deepen our understanding of political Islam in Indonesia. Judging from the world's Islamic politics, in countries such as Egypt and Turkey, Islamic parties that have adopted similar tactics to the Prosperity and Justice Party have also been successful in recent elections. The empirical facts at home and abroad show that this problem is both unique and general in theory. This article uses the literature method, the basic statistical method and the case study method. In this paper, an analytical framework of "two steps-four angles" is proposed. The first step is to define and operationalize the concept of moderation. On this basis, test whether the Prosperity and Justice Party's activities meet the definition of moderation. Only by verifying that the party's activities are indeed moderate can they be further analysed. In the second step, this paper first analyzes the nature of the moderate transformation of the Prosperity and Justice Party, and then explains the causes of the moderation from three aspects: the purpose, the leadership structure and the ideology. The conclusion is that the moderate nature of the Prosperity and Justice Party is both substantive and pragmatic. The case of the Prosperity and Justice Party confirms that the "two-track" line of the Islamic party, the "two-track" line, is likely to be moderated in order to integrate more quickly into the democratic political system and gain more political resources within the system. The objective of Islamization, on the other hand, indirectly benefited from the moderate transformation. (3) the leaning of the party leadership structure towards the pragmatists is the direct driving force of the moderation. 4) the history of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood ideology and education movement in Indonesia is moderate. The source of ideology, But the aim of Islamization may cast a question mark on the party's ability to remain moderate in the future. Finally, the paper points out that pragmatism and Islamization are a pair of interdependent and exclusive contradictions, which are the core problems that need to be solved in the future development of Prosperity and Justice Party.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D734.2

【参考文献】