跨国城市网络的实验主义治理研究——以欧洲跨国城市网络中的气候治理为例

发布时间：2018-05-12 17:38

本文选题：跨国城市网络 + 实验主义治理　；参考：《欧洲研究》2014年06期

【摘要】：实验主义治理是有别于大多边主义治理模式的新型多元主义治理模式,强调治理的网络弹性、知识创新性和实验回归性。本文以跨国城市网络为研究主体,对跨国城市网络中的实验主义治理逻辑进行了归纳和总结。作为全球实验主义治理的滥觞之地,欧盟开放式协调及多层治理模式推动了跨国城市网络的发展。通过比较四个欧洲跨国城市网络在气候治理中的表现,本文认为跨国城市网络的整体治理路径符合实验主义治理的基本逻辑假设。其中内部治理(信息交流、基准设定)和内外交汇式治理(项目合作、网络调解)促进了网络内部的实验创新性,为城市网络的实验创新和经验扩散提供了各种治理资源。外部治理(对外影响、相互依赖)和内外部交汇式治理开拓了实验治理的反馈渠道,有助于提升城市网络在欧盟政策制定过程中的影响力,特别是促进政策评估的科学性以及政策框架目标的定期修订。而且,根植于欧盟的地区深入性网络比全球和地区号召性网络在实验主义治理上更具优势,全球深入性网络的治理成效则介于两者之间。
[Abstract]:Experimental governance is a new type of pluralistic governance model, which is different from most of the governance mode of edge doctrine. It emphasizes the network flexibility, knowledge innovation and experimental regression of governance. In this paper, the experimental governance logic in transnational city network is summarized and summarized. As the origin of global experimental governance, the European Union's open coordination and multi-level governance model promote the development of transnational urban network. By comparing the performance of four European transnational urban networks in climate governance, this paper argues that the overall governance path of transnational urban networks conforms to the basic logical assumptions of experimental governance. Among them, internal governance (information exchange, benchmark setting) and internal and external intersecting governance (project cooperation, network mediation) promote experimental innovation within the network, and provide various governance resources for experimental innovation and experience diffusion of urban networks. External governance (external influence, interdependence) and internal and external intersecting governance open up feedback channels for experimental governance, helping to enhance the influence of urban networks in the EU policymaking process. In particular, to promote the scientific nature of policy evaluation and the regular revision of policy framework objectives. Moreover, the regional in-depth network rooted in the European Union has more advantages in experimental governance than the global and regional call networks, and the governance effectiveness of the global in-depth network lies somewhere between the two.
【作者单位】：山东大学政治学与公共管理学院;德国柏林自由大学;中国人民大学国际关系学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点课题项目“绿色变革视角下的国内外生态文化重大理论研究”(项目编号:12AZD074) 山东大学基本科研业务费资助项目(项目编号:11060074614051) 中国人民大学研究生科学研究基金项目(科研编号:14XNH030)的资助和支持
【分类号】：P46;D75

【相似文献】