物质、制度、规范综合视角下的东亚安全秩序

发布时间：2018-05-22 13:45

本文选题：东亚安全秩序 + 新型大国关系　；参考：《南洋问题研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：自1979年以来,东亚地区基本保持了稳定与和平,没有大的战乱与冲突发生。是什么机制维持了东亚的安全与稳定,学界颇多争议。鉴于彼得·卡赞斯坦等学者主张的折中主义分析方法,当前地区的安全秩序主要是由大国间的互动决定的,大国间互动的方式可以从物质、制度与规范3个层面综合全面地进行考察。习近平主席强调的"新型大国关系",不仅是一种处理崛起国与霸权国结构性矛盾的方法与愿景,也是一种对未来维持地区安全秩序的蓝图。结合近些年国内外对于东亚地区安全形势的研究,当前东亚地区的安全秩序由如下3个方面决定:在物质层面上主要是美国与中国安全与经济政策的互动及相互影响;在制度层面主要是大国以现实主义的目的参与东盟为中心的制度建设;在规范层面则是大国推行自由主义规范与主权规范的相互竞争。
[Abstract]:Since 1979, East Asia has basically maintained stability and peace, no major wars and conflicts. The mechanism that maintains the security and stability of East Asia is controversial. In view of the eclectic analysis method advocated by scholars such as Peter Kazanstein, the current security order in the region is mainly determined by the interaction between the great powers, which can be done in a material way. System and norms of the three levels of comprehensive and comprehensive investigation. The "new type of great power relationship" emphasized by Chairman Xi Jinping is not only a method and vision to deal with the structural contradiction between rising powers and hegemonic powers, but also a blueprint for maintaining regional security and order in the future. Combined with the domestic and foreign research on the security situation in East Asia in recent years, the current security order in East Asia is determined by the following three aspects: the interaction and interaction between the security and economic policies of the United States and China on the material level; At the institutional level, the major powers mainly participate in the ASEAN system construction with the aim of realism, while the normative level is the competition between the great powers to carry out the liberal norms and the sovereign norms.
【作者单位】：新西兰奥克兰大学政治学与国际关系学系;山东理工大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：山东理工大学博士科研启动基金项目“中国特色区域合作理论体系研究”(4033-714012) 山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究计划项目“改革开放以来中国区域合作理论的历史演进及其现实启示研究”(J15WA19) 国家留学基金委资助(2011622008)
【分类号】：D731

【相似文献】