俄罗斯是否存在“重评”斯大林思潮

发布时间：2018-06-20 00:01

本文选题：思考 + 学术争论　；参考：《探索与争鸣》2013年10期

【摘要】：前几年发生在中国学术思想界的这场争论,最初提出和涉及的原本是一个纯粹俄罗斯的"斯大林问题",即俄罗斯社会怎样评价斯大林,到底是否存在"重新评价"、"重新肯定"斯大林的问题。但该问题被有关学者从俄罗斯移植到中国,再经过扭曲、变形和放大之后,实际上变成了一个具有某种中国问题性质的"斯大林问题"。其实,由于中俄两国社会历史条件不同,中国当前改革面临的"斯大林问题",与俄罗斯近些年呼唤"强权"、"铁腕"所提出的"斯大林问题",是性质必须完全不同的问题。将这二者相混淆,有违"中国道路"必须革除斯大林模式弊端这一改革方向。"重评"问题,实际上提出了我们目前对斯大林体制和苏联模式的态度问题:对它是革,还是保;是继续超越、突破苏联模式,还是维护、固守这一模式。这是对待改革态度的分水岭,也是坚持改革与否的试金石。
[Abstract]:The controversy that took place in China's academic and ideological circles a few years ago originally raised and involved a purely Russian "Stalin issue", that is, how the Russian society evaluates Stalin. Whether or not there is the question of "reappraisal" and "reconfirmation" of Stalin. However, the problem was transplanted from Russia to China by the scholars concerned. After distortion, distortion and amplification, it actually became a "Stalin problem" with a certain nature of China problem. In fact, because of the different social and historical conditions between China and Russia, the "Stalin problem" facing China's current reform is a problem that must be completely different in nature from the "Stalin issue" raised by Russia in recent years calling for "power" and "iron hand". To confuse the two goes against the reform direction that Stalin's model must be eliminated. " The question of "reassessment" actually raises the question of our current attitude towards the Stalin system and the Soviet model: whether it should be reformed or protected; whether we should continue to transcend, break through the Soviet model, or maintain it; and stick to this model. This is the watershed of attitude towards reform, but also the touchstone of adherence to reform or not.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院世界历史研究所;温州大学;
【分类号】：D751.2

【参考文献】