体制模式是历史与现实因素的契合点——就苏联剧变原因与程恩富、丁军先生商榷

发布时间：2018-07-06 11:38

本文选题：苏联剧变 + 斯大林模式　；参考：《当代世界社会主义问题》2013年03期

【摘要】：《中国社会科学》2011年第6期上程恩富和丁军的《苏联剧变主要原因的系统分析》一文,对苏联剧变原因的分析在某种程度上摆脱了"九评"槽臼,较之归因于从赫鲁晓夫到戈尔巴乔夫的"变质背叛论",更客观一些,是一个进步。但应打破苏联剧变现实因素与历史因素关系问题上的折衷主义,更加勇敢地面对历史,更准确地把握历史与现实的关系。苏联的种种弊端大都是传统体制的结果。体制模式是苏联剧变的历史与现实因素的契合点。程恩富、丁军文章也认为苏联剧变和解体的思想、组织和政治三大主要原因是"基于高度集权和僵化的传统社会主义体制和模式"之上的,但这与文章开头的论断相矛盾;文章在论题概括和资料运用等方面也存在不足。
[Abstract]:A systematic Analysis of the main causes of the Soviet upheaval in the sixth issue of "Social Science of China" in 2011, the analysis of the causes of the Soviet upheaval has to some extent cast off the "nine comments" on the main causes of the Soviet upheaval. This is more objective than the metamorphosis and betrayal attributed from Khrushchev to Gorbachev. However, we should break the eclecticism of the relationship between the realistic factors and historical factors in the Soviet Union, face history bravely and grasp the relationship between history and reality more accurately. The shortcomings of the Soviet Union are mostly the result of the traditional system. The system model is the joint point of the historical and realistic factors of the Soviet Union's dramatic changes. Cheng Enfu, Ding Jun's article also believed that the three main reasons of the Soviet Union's radical change, organization and politics were "based on the highly centralized and rigid traditional socialist system and mode", but this contradicted the conclusion at the beginning of the article. There are also shortcomings in the summary of the topic and the application of data.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院世界历史所;
【基金】：教育部人文社科基金青年项目“当代俄罗斯反思的马克思主义学派研究”(项目号12YJC710084)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D751.2

【参考文献】