1920年代后期殖民地朝鲜对马克思主义的接受情况及其意义——以《朝鲜之光》的“唯物-唯心”论战为例
发布时间：2018-10-29 19:17
【摘要】：朝鲜自1919年三一运动之后,人们对社会主义思想的关注日益增加。一些从日本留学回来的知识分子为了主导理论阵地,主要以《朝鲜之光》这一期刊平台发表多篇文章对"唯物-唯心"进行论战。通过些论战,主导者主张清除朝鲜社会主义运动中的马克思主义修正主义思想,同时他们一方面承认"民族统一战线",一方面积极展开论战要求贯彻实施无产阶级领导权,从而意图确保社会主义运动的阶级独立性。这些论战文章重视人类主体意识的唯心主义立场,强调人类的变革意志及需求的唯物主义立场,强调生产力是历史发展的终极决定因素的唯物主义立场。这些论战具有其历史意义:唯物-唯心论战并不是抽象的哲学争论,而是民族统一战线"新干会"成立以后在社会主义者之间的路线对立,以及新干会内部民族主义与社会主义之间争夺主导权的政治背景下展开的实践性论战;同时,论战这使得马克思列宁主义迅速得以接收传播。
[Abstract]:Since the March 1 Movement in 1919, people have paid more and more attention to socialist thought. In order to dominate the theoretical position, some intellectuals who returned from studying in Japan mainly published several articles on "materialist idealism" on the platform of "the Light of Korea". Through some controversy, the leaders advocated the elimination of Marxist revisionism in the Korean socialist movement, and on the one hand they recognized the "national United front" and, on the other hand, they actively launched the debate to demand the implementation of the proletarian leadership. It was intended to ensure the class independence of the socialist movement. These articles attach importance to the idealist standpoint of human subject consciousness, emphasize the materialist standpoint of human will to change and demand, and emphasize that productivity is the ultimate determinant of historical development. These debates have historical significance: the war of materialism and idealism is not an abstract philosophical argument, but rather the opposition of the line between the socialists after the founding of the National United Front "New cadres". And the practical controversy between nationalism and socialism in the political background of leadership; At the same time, the controversy made it possible for Marxism-Leninism to receive and spread quickly.
【作者单位】： 韩国建国大学统一人文学研究院;南京大学外国语学院韩语系;南京大学外语学院韩语系;
【分类号】：D731.25
，
本文编号：2298564
[Abstract]:Since the March 1 Movement in 1919, people have paid more and more attention to socialist thought. In order to dominate the theoretical position, some intellectuals who returned from studying in Japan mainly published several articles on "materialist idealism" on the platform of "the Light of Korea". Through some controversy, the leaders advocated the elimination of Marxist revisionism in the Korean socialist movement, and on the one hand they recognized the "national United front" and, on the other hand, they actively launched the debate to demand the implementation of the proletarian leadership. It was intended to ensure the class independence of the socialist movement. These articles attach importance to the idealist standpoint of human subject consciousness, emphasize the materialist standpoint of human will to change and demand, and emphasize that productivity is the ultimate determinant of historical development. These debates have historical significance: the war of materialism and idealism is not an abstract philosophical argument, but rather the opposition of the line between the socialists after the founding of the National United Front "New cadres". And the practical controversy between nationalism and socialism in the political background of leadership; At the same time, the controversy made it possible for Marxism-Leninism to receive and spread quickly.
【作者单位】： 韩国建国大学统一人文学研究院;南京大学外国语学院韩语系;南京大学外语学院韩语系;
【分类号】：D731.25
，
本文编号：2298564
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2298564.html
