欧盟地区政策改革与效应研究
发布时间：2018-11-08 07:17
【摘要】： 欧盟地区政策是欧盟政策体系中的一项重要政策。对该政策的研究，是深入理解和把握欧洲一体化的困境与未来的重要切入口。本文对欧盟地区政策的研究主要从两个大的方面展开：改革与效应。 随着欧盟(欧共体)的不断扩大以及全球化过程中国际竞争的加剧，从20世纪70年代初步建立开始，欧盟地区政策先后经历了1988年、1999年、2004-2006年等多次重要改革，并逐步确立起完善成熟的政策体系。欧盟地区政策改革呈现出几个重要特点和趋势：“凝聚力”与“竞争力”双重目标强化趋势；程序的不断简化；欧盟、国家、地区等不同层级间“合作”不断加强，各自职权也进一步明晰，等等。 欧盟地区政策的“效应”研究主要分为三个纬度：一是经济与社会效应，二是地域和空间效应，三是制度效应。从经济、社会和地域效应看，欧盟机构本身对欧盟地区政策的评估，以及经济学家借用新古典经济学、内生经济增长理论、新地理经济学等理论方法的评估，都没有得出足够乐观的结论。其中需要强调的是，欧盟地区政策效应评估过程中呈现出越来越明显的“地域化”和“空间化”趋势，，这一趋势也同样反映在欧盟建设整个过程中。总体而言，人们普遍认为欧盟国家间的差距得到了一定程度的缩小，而国家内部地区间差距却在不断扩大。但我们并不能因此就完全否定欧盟地区政策的功效。因为如果没有这一政策，欧盟地区差距或许会更加严峻。 此外，欧盟地区政策的“制度效应”主要表现在欧盟推动下的成员国“地区化”进程中。以波兰为例的中东欧国家“地区化”进程的“失败”，说明没有统一的“欧洲化”的“模板”，欧盟应该尽可能的尊重各国的“多样性”，实现“多样性中的统一”(Unie dans la diversit(?))。与此同时，欧洲“地区化”进程所遭遇的困难也让我们思考“地区”层级的相对地位问题，而“多层级治理”的模式关注不同等级之间资源的共享而非竞争，能够对此做出较为合理的诠释。 最后，欧盟地区政策对中国地区发展有着一定的“启发性思考”和“可能性借鉴”：兼顾公平与效率，简化程序，加强各层级合作，通过“分权化”使职权明晰，加强监管，改变法律和制度“缺位”等等。
[Abstract]:EU regional policy is an important policy in EU policy system. The study of this policy is an important way to understand and grasp the dilemma of European integration and the future. The research of EU regional policy is mainly carried out from two aspects: reform and effect. With the continuous expansion of the European Union (EC) and the intensification of international competition in the process of globalization, since the initial establishment of the 1970s, the regional policy of the EU has undergone many important reforms such as 1988, 1999, 2004-2006 and so on. And gradually establish a mature policy system. There are several important features and trends in the policy reform of the European Union: "cohesion" and "competitiveness" are the dual objectives of strengthening the trend, the process of continuous simplification; European Union, national, regional and other levels of cooperation between the strengthening, their respective powers and responsibilities, and so on. The study on the "effect" of EU regional policy is divided into three latitudes: one is economic and social effect, the other is regional and spatial effect, and the third is institutional effect. From the point of view of economic, social and regional effects, the EU institutions themselves evaluate the EU regional policy, and economists use neoclassical economics, endogenous economic growth theory, new geographical economics and other theoretical methods to evaluate, They have not come to a conclusion that is optimistic enough. It should be emphasized that there are more and more obvious trends of "regionalization" and "spatialization" in the process of assessing the effect of EU regional policy, which is also reflected in the whole process of EU construction. Generally speaking, it is generally believed that the gap between EU countries has been narrowed to a certain extent, while the gap between regions within the EU is widening. But we cannot deny the effectiveness of the EU's regional policy altogether. Without such a policy, regional disparities in the EU might be even more acute. In addition, the "institutional effect" of the EU's regional policy is mainly reflected in the process of "regionalization" promoted by the EU. Taking Poland as an example, the "failure" of the process of "regionalization" in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe shows that without a unified "template" of "Europeanization", the EU should do its utmost to respect the "diversity" of each country. Implementing "Unity in Diversity" (Unie dans la diversit (?). At the same time, the difficulties in the process of "regionalization" in Europe make us think about the relative status of the "regional" level, while the "multi-level governance" model focuses on the sharing of resources between different levels rather than on competition. To be able to make a more reasonable interpretation of this. Finally, the European Union's regional policy has a certain "enlightening thinking" and "possible reference" to China's regional development: taking equity and efficiency into account, simplifying procedures, strengthening cooperation at all levels, clarifying powers and powers through "decentralization", and strengthening supervision and control. Change the law and system of "vacancy" and so on.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D75
本文编号：2317769
[Abstract]:EU regional policy is an important policy in EU policy system. The study of this policy is an important way to understand and grasp the dilemma of European integration and the future. The research of EU regional policy is mainly carried out from two aspects: reform and effect. With the continuous expansion of the European Union (EC) and the intensification of international competition in the process of globalization, since the initial establishment of the 1970s, the regional policy of the EU has undergone many important reforms such as 1988, 1999, 2004-2006 and so on. And gradually establish a mature policy system. There are several important features and trends in the policy reform of the European Union: "cohesion" and "competitiveness" are the dual objectives of strengthening the trend, the process of continuous simplification; European Union, national, regional and other levels of cooperation between the strengthening, their respective powers and responsibilities, and so on. The study on the "effect" of EU regional policy is divided into three latitudes: one is economic and social effect, the other is regional and spatial effect, and the third is institutional effect. From the point of view of economic, social and regional effects, the EU institutions themselves evaluate the EU regional policy, and economists use neoclassical economics, endogenous economic growth theory, new geographical economics and other theoretical methods to evaluate, They have not come to a conclusion that is optimistic enough. It should be emphasized that there are more and more obvious trends of "regionalization" and "spatialization" in the process of assessing the effect of EU regional policy, which is also reflected in the whole process of EU construction. Generally speaking, it is generally believed that the gap between EU countries has been narrowed to a certain extent, while the gap between regions within the EU is widening. But we cannot deny the effectiveness of the EU's regional policy altogether. Without such a policy, regional disparities in the EU might be even more acute. In addition, the "institutional effect" of the EU's regional policy is mainly reflected in the process of "regionalization" promoted by the EU. Taking Poland as an example, the "failure" of the process of "regionalization" in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe shows that without a unified "template" of "Europeanization", the EU should do its utmost to respect the "diversity" of each country. Implementing "Unity in Diversity" (Unie dans la diversit (?). At the same time, the difficulties in the process of "regionalization" in Europe make us think about the relative status of the "regional" level, while the "multi-level governance" model focuses on the sharing of resources between different levels rather than on competition. To be able to make a more reasonable interpretation of this. Finally, the European Union's regional policy has a certain "enlightening thinking" and "possible reference" to China's regional development: taking equity and efficiency into account, simplifying procedures, strengthening cooperation at all levels, clarifying powers and powers through "decentralization", and strengthening supervision and control. Change the law and system of "vacancy" and so on.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D75
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 臧术美;;欧盟地区政策的经济、社会与地域效应研究[J];德国研究;2011年03期
2 朱贵昌;;试析欧盟地区政策的伙伴关系原则[J];国际论坛;2011年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 马勇;欧盟科技一体化研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
本文编号：2317769
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/2317769.html
