城市视域中的马克思主义社会空间理论初探

  本文关键词：城市视域中的马克思主义社会空间理论初探，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

        空间在思想史中经历了不同的命运。当进入到马克思主义理论时,空间成为一个不可缺失的维度,但由于不同需求,空间在马克思主义理论研究中或隐或显的展示出来。为了能清晰的把新、老马克思主义中的空间思想／理论梳理出来,本文借助历史唯物主义体系内的广义和狭义两个向度作为梳理框架。并在梳理之后进行比较,从中得出对当今社会的启示。具体来说,文章共分为四个部分：第一部分首先回顾了空间在思想史上的不同认知,并讨论了在步入马克思主义视域之后所经历的“待遇”以及目前国内外的研究状况。在马克思主义理论中,空间不仅获得了“应有”的“地位”(不仅在理论地位上得到重视,而且受到了一个合理的,科学的重视),而且内容更加丰富。同时,为了完成本文对马克思主义理论中的空间思想进行挖掘、梳理和理解的要旨,在这之前,做了两方面的准备工作：一方面指出了作为马克思主义空间思想的理论背景,同时也是理论切入口的城市性概念,另一方面在此基础上,以历史唯物主义的广义和狭义两个向度为框架,去进入到马克思主义社会空间的探索。最后明确了本文写作的意义。第二部分具体地进入到马克思主义经典作家的空间思想的梳理工作时分别从广义历史唯物主义和狭义历史唯物主义两个视角进行的。在广义历史唯物主义平台上,以唯物主义历史观为原则,认识了作为人类的生存空间的社会空间是如何生成的。并以城市为理论载体,来梳理在生产方式的基础上,人类社会空问形态的历史变化。在狭义历史唯物主义平台上,梳理了在资本主义生产中空间的意义,并以城市住宅问题为例,指出在资本主义的全面统治下,表现出的具体的空间问题。第三部分介绍了在新时期理论界发生了空间转向,空间不再是被隐性的表达出来,而成为一个显性概念。空间作为直接的理论对象而被讨论,这是和新时期,城市化在全球展开的境遇相关的。直接讨论城市已经不能完全说明问题,而需要从空间的维度对新时代全球社会展开讨论。从广义历史唯物主义来看,列斐伏尔的“空间生产”升级了历史唯物主义理论体系。从狭义历史唯物主义来看,大卫·哈维则从空间的维度上,以资本积累为核心,贯穿了全球地理景观的变化。并最终从空间的角度探讨了人类的解放,实现了广义和狭义某种意义上的结合。第四部分对马克思主义空间思想在广义和狭义两个向度上的逻辑切换以及新马克思城市学者们对马克思主义经典作家在城市视域中的空间思想/理论上的升级和重新阐发进行比较和总结,并指出这种理论中的逻辑转换及思想的传承发展对当今世界性问题本质的揭示和对中国空间规划的启示。

    Space was recognized in different ways in the history of ideas. When coming into the sphere of Marxist theory, space became an obbligato dimension. However, according to various demands, space was employed either in the implicit ways or in the explicit way. In order to ravel the ideas/theories of space in the Marxist and Neo-Marxist theories,the paper applies the both single-dimensions--broad sense and narrow sense--of historical materialism as the frame. And after the spatial ideas raveled out, they are compared then. The paper hope the comparative analysis can enlighten the current social practice. The whole paper was arranged into4parts following:The first part is the preparation for the whole paper, which first reviews the different recognitions of space, and then discusses the situation of space in Marxist theory, in which space not only deserves a due position, but also acquires more connotations. And ahead of raveling out the spatial ideas in the following parts, paper makes a full preparation---the theoretical point-cut and the theoretical frame. In the end of the past,the significance of the paper is revealed.The second part gets down to ravel out the spatial ideas in classical Marxist authors’works. The job was worked respectively on broad sense and narrow sense of historical materialism.On the broad sense, the issues of how the human’s living space -social space-was created and how the spatial form changes according to the processing modes of production in the human’s history are raveled out. On the narrow sense, the importance of space for the capitalist economy was told, and the spatial problems in the capitalist society was asked.The third part presents the spatial conversion in the idea realm. At then,space, as a direct object, was no longer expressed in the invisible way, but in the visible way instead. And the conversion is relevant to the urbanization in the global sphere. In this condition, it is impossible to explain the spatial issues by discussing the urban/city. Instead, it is due to discuss the global society of the new time. On the broad sense of historical materialism, the concept of "production of space" from Henry Lefebvre promoted the traditional historical materialism up-grading. On the narrow sense, David Harvey described the changes of geographical landscape under the control of capital accumulation on the spatial dimension, and finally Harvey probed the human’s liberation from the angle of space, connecting the broad and narrow sense of historical materialism in a certain sense.The forth part is the last part, which compares and concludes not only the logical shift of the broad sense and narrow sense,but also the connection and conversion between classical Marxist author and Neo-Marxist schools of urban. And with the help of the findings, the paper tries to obtain some enlightenment for exploring the essence of the current cosmopolitan issues, and for refreshing the city’s landscaping planning.

城市视域中的马克思主义社会空间理论初探

摘要3-5Abstract5-6第一章 导论8-21    1.1 “空间”在思想史上的命运及研究现状综述8-10    1.2 马克思主义空间思想的现实背景和理论入口10-14    1.3 马克思主义空间思想梳理框架：广义和狭义双重向度14-19    1.4 马克思主义空间思想的研究意义19-21第二章 经典马克思主义理论中社会空间思想的发掘21-35    2.1 广义历史唯物主义向度上的空间思想22-29        2.1.1 人类空间的建构：人化自然22-24        2.1.2 生产方式(分工)对于空间形态的塑造24-29    2.2 狭义历史唯物主义向度上的空间思想29-35        2.2.1 资本主义生产领域中空间的能动性30-32        2.2.2 资本主义社会典型的生存空间问题32-35第三章 马克思主义空间理论的研究典范——新马克思主义城市学派35-53    3.1 新马克思主义城市学派空间理论产生的背景35-37    3.2 新马克思主义城市空间理论中广义和狭义向度37-38    3.3 (社会)空间生产理论：广义历史唯物主义的空间改造38-44    3.4 资本积累的空间外现：狭义历史唯物主义的空间阐发44-48    3.5 “不平衡空间发展”到“希望的空间”：狭义向广义的展望48-53第四章 结论53-62    4.1 马克思主义空间思想的视角转变和向度切换53-55    4.2 “城市”和“空间”范畴在空间思想中的地位转换55-57    4.3 新马克思主义对传统马克思主义空间思想的升华57-58    4.4 马克思主义空间思想发展的现实性启示58-62参考文献62-66后记66-68

  本文关键词：城市视域中的马克思主义社会空间理论初探，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。