汉语“民族”概念逻辑分析与民族研究

发布时间:2018-01-21 23:21

  本文关键词: 民族概念 逻辑分析 民族研究 话语权 出处:《云南民族大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:民族是人类社会中最普遍而又最基本的人们共同体,自身形成发展演化具有客观实在性,而反映这一社会现象的民族定义就其严密性和科学性存在颇多争议。长期以来,我国学术界研究普遍的情况是囿于斯大林有关民族的论述,思维形式始终围绕着民族特征要素加以发挥而鲜有突破。毋容置疑,学术术语或概念的形成不可避免地体现着人类社会不同历史阶段、不同社会、甚至具有不同价值观的人们对它的理解和阐释。而民族概念如何真正反映民族这一客观实体,这不仅影响着民族理论学科体系建设和发展,更重要在于明确学科研究的重点和根本任务。本文将汉语“民族”概念逻辑分析树立于民族过程的客观规律基础上加以概括民族本质特征的哲学方法论,,以科学认知民族这一客观存在为逻辑起点,继而探讨中国化的马克思主义民族理论和马克思主义民族理论中国化。第一章回顾了汉语“民族”概念的由来和演化的基本脉络;第二章梳理前辈汉语“民族”概念的含义与界定研究成果;第三章重在分析汉语“民族”概念的特点与逻辑结构,论述汉语“民族”概念逻辑分析哲学方法论;第四章主要是针对汉语“民族”概念与中国特色的民族研究逻辑关系进行梳理和阐述。以民族的本质属性为民族理论研究的逻辑起点,从而揭示现象的起源、本质和发展规律,并力求加以理论概括,是民族理论学科研究既要加强基础理论研究又要重视应用研究方法论,而且在两者结合的基础上把重点放到了现实的民族研究上来,富有民族研究者必须具有的历史使命和重大责任,这对于正确领悟中国化的马克思主义民族理论和科学驾驭马克思主义民族理论中国化发展规律有着更为一般的意义。作为马克思主义民族理论中国化发展和创新研究上溯几千年本土民族思想文化传统,符合拥有五千年悠久绵长文化的中华民族历史坐标和定位。在世界的广阔视野展示了中国自己鲜明的主体性立场,有益于在全球语境下我国民族理论研究和学术交流过程中的话语权。
[Abstract]:The nation is the most common and basic human community in human society, and its own formation, development and evolution is objective and realistic. The definition of nationality which reflects this social phenomenon has many controversies on its strictness and scientificalness. For a long time, the general situation of academic research in our country is confined to Stalin's exposition on ethnic groups. There is no doubt that the formation of academic terms or concepts inevitably reflects the different historical stages and different societies of human society. Even people with different values understand and interpret it, and how the concept of nationality really reflects the objective entity of nationality not only affects the construction and development of the discipline system of ethnic theory. It is more important to make clear the emphasis and fundamental task of the subject research. This paper sets the logic analysis of Chinese "nation" concept on the basis of the objective law of the national process to generalize the philosophical methodology of the essential characteristics of the nation. Taking the objective existence of scientific cognition nation as the logical starting point. The first chapter reviews the origin and evolution of the concept of "nationality" in Chinese. The second chapter combs the meaning and the definition research result of the predecessor Chinese "nationality" concept; The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the characteristics and logical structure of the concept of "nationality" in Chinese, and discusses the philosophical methodology of logic analysis of the concept of "nationality" in Chinese. Chapter 4th mainly deals with the relationship between the concept of "nationality" in Chinese and the logic of ethnic study with Chinese characteristics. Taking the essential attribute of nationality as the logical starting point of the study of national theory, it reveals the origin of the phenomenon. The essence and the law of development, and try to sum up the theory, is that the research of ethnic theory should not only strengthen the basic theoretical research but also attach importance to the applied research methodology. And on the basis of the combination of the two to focus on the reality of ethnic research, rich ethnic researchers must have the historical mission and major responsibilities. This is of more general significance for correctly understanding the Sinicization of the Marxist national theory and scientifically governing the development law of the Sinicization of the Marxist national theory. Development and Innovation of the Marxist National Theory in China. The study goes back thousands of years native nation thought culture tradition. In line with the historical coordinates and positioning of the Chinese nation, which has a long and long culture of five thousand years, the broad vision of the world shows China's own distinct position of subjectivity. It is beneficial to the right of speech in the course of national theory research and academic exchange in the global context.
【学位授予单位】:云南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:A811;D633

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 马戎;理解民族关系的新思路——少数族群问题的“去政治化”[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年06期

2 纳日碧力戈;问难“族群”[J];广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年01期

3 侯哲安;;论民族一词的科学涵义[J];贵州社会科学;1981年02期

4 都永浩;;对民族共同体的多维思考[J];黑龙江民族丛刊;2008年05期

5 何叔涛;;对20世纪在中国最有影响的三大民族定义的简要评析[J];黑龙江民族丛刊;2009年04期

6 林耀华;;关于“民族”一词的使用和译名的问题[J];历史研究;1963年02期

7 张儒;李晓晖;;费孝通谈“民族”[J];中国民族;1986年06期

8 金炳镐;;试论斯大林民族定义的特点[J];广西民族研究;1987年01期

9 牙含章;论民族[J];民族研究;1982年05期

10 熊锡元;风俗习惯应否列为民族构成要素?——关于民族定义的一点看法[J];民族研究;1983年01期



本文编号:1452847

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/1452847.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户28f71***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com