Fetischismus及相关词在马克思著作中的话语变迁

发布时间：2018-04-10 16:38

本文选题：Fetischismus + 拜物教性质　；参考：《现代哲学》2017年01期

【摘要】：马克思著作中Fetischismus及相关词Fetisch、Fetischdiener的使用,经历了由“沿用旧义”到“赋予新意”的“话语变迁”。这一“话语变迁”,缘于“指称对象”的“领域转移”:由指称社会崇拜现象(属“意识形态领域”)到指称商品生产与交换领域的现象。这一“领域转移”,是在马克思的研究重心发生转移的思想大背景下发生的,它缘于马克思对于两个“指称对象”的“共同点”的体认——“人手的产物”与“人脑的产物”作为“产物”都实现了相对于自己的“创造者”的“独立化”。不过,我们需要同时明确两个“指称对象”的差别:Fetischismus的“旧义”,泛指人们把某种自然或人造物看作具有魔力的东西而加以崇拜的社会现象,而马克思赋予Fetischismus的其中一个“新意”,却特指“经济学家”的一种“错认”;“崇拜”物与作为一种“错认”的“拜物教观念”,是两个不同层面的问题,不能混同。
[Abstract]:The use of Fetischismus and the related word Fetischdiener in Marx's works has undergone a "discourse change" from "using the old meaning" to "giving new meaning".This "discourse change" is due to the "domain transfer" of the "object of reference": from the phenomenon of referring to social worship (belonging to the field of ideology) to the field of the production and exchange of reference goods.This "field shift" took place against the background of Marx's thought of shifting the focus of research.It stems from Marx's understanding of the "common ground" of the two "objects of reference"-"the product of the human hand" and "the product of the human brain" as the "product", both of which have achieved "independence" relative to their own "creator".However, we need to clarify at the same time the difference between the two "objects of reference": the "Old meaning" of the "Old meaning" of the two "objects of reference", the social phenomenon in which people worship something natural or man-made as something with magic,One of the "new ideas" given by Marx to Fetischismus refers specifically to the "mistaken recognition" of "economists", and "worship" and "fetishism" as a kind of "mistaken recognition" are two different levels of problems, which cannot be mixed with each other.
【作者单位】：浙江大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B27

【相似文献】