《〈黑格尔法哲学批判〉导言》的历史地位

发布时间：2018-07-02 15:18

本文选题：唯物主义 + 唯心主义　；参考：《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年04期

【摘要】：本文全面地评价了马克思的《〈黑格尔法哲学批判〉导言》在马克思主义发展史上的地位,既肯定了这篇文章在马克思向辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义以及科学社会主义转变过程中的重要地位,又指出了它尚未完成这种转变,并对主张马克思这篇文章彻底完成了从唯心主义向唯物主义、从革命民主主义向共产主义转变的观点的不当之处作了具体分析,指出了这种观点没有说明这里所说的"唯物主义"和"共产主义"是什么性质的唯物主义和共产主义。指出"两种转变"思想的不当之处,不是要低估这部著作在马克思主义发展史上的地位,而是为了准确评价它在马克思主义发展史上的地位,既充分肯定它比以前的著作离完成向辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义以及科学社会主义的转变更加接近,也实事求是地指出它离完成这个转变尚有不小的差距,以便清楚地看到在它以后的论著是如何逐步消除这个差距、直到基本完成这个转变的。
[Abstract]:This paper comprehensively evaluates the position of the introduction of Marx's "criticism of Hegel's philosophy of Law" in the history of the development of Marxism. It not only affirms the important position of this article in the process of Marx's transition to dialectical materialism, historical materialism and scientific socialism, but also points out that it has not yet completed this transformation. It also makes a concrete analysis of the inappropriateness of the viewpoint that Marx's article has completely completed the transformation from idealism to materialism and from revolutionary democracy to communism. It is pointed out that this view does not explain what kind of materialism and communism are referred to here. It is pointed out that the improper idea of "two transformations" is not to underestimate the position of this work in the history of Marxism, but to accurately evaluate its position in the history of Marxist development. Affirming fully that it is closer than previous works to the transition from completion to dialectical and historical materialism and scientific socialism, and pointing out realistically that there is still a considerable gap between completion and completion of this transformation, In order to see clearly in its later works how to gradually close the gap, until the basic completion of the transition.
【作者单位】：北京大学中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心;
【分类号】：A811

【相似文献】