“三种社会形态论”与“四种生产方式论”再研究——以《资本论》及手稿为中心

发布时间：2018-08-18 11:21

【摘要】："三种社会形态论"与"四种生产方式论"的再研究对于重新理解"五种社会形态论",进而对于历史唯物主义基本原理的当代发展具有重要理论意义,对于科学认识中国特色社会主义道路具有重要的现实意义。不能仅仅基于《1857—1858年经济学手稿》的"三种社会形态论"表述,局限于交换关系层面来理解其内涵,而是应该基于《资本论》从生产关系层面重新理解其深刻内涵。同时,也不能仅仅从历史进程的先后次序性角度把"四种生产方式论"简单化,而是应当从历史规律的深刻视角来把握其复杂内涵。"三种社会形态论"与"四种生产方式论"之间的统一性实质上是普遍规律与多元道路、历史规律与主体活动的统一性。正确把握"三种社会形态论"与"四种生产方式论"的统一性与差异性,对于推进历史唯物主义的当代发展、深化中国特色社会主义道路的科学认识具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。
[Abstract]:The further study of "three social forms" and "four modes of production" is of great theoretical significance to the re-understanding of "five forms of social formation" and to the contemporary development of the basic principles of historical materialism. For the scientific understanding of the socialist road with Chinese characteristics has an important practical significance. It is not only based on the expression of "three social forms" in < 1857-1858 economic manuscripts], it is limited to the level of exchange relations to understand its connotation, but should be based on "Capital" to re-understand its profound connotation from the aspect of production relations. At the same time, we should not simply simplify the "four modes of production" from the perspective of the sequence of historical processes, but should grasp its complex connotation from the profound perspective of historical laws. " The unity between "three kinds of social formation" and "four modes of production" is, in essence, a universal law and a pluralistic road, a historical law and a unity of subject activities. To correctly grasp the unity and difference between "three social forms" and "four modes of production" will promote the contemporary development of historical materialism. Deepening the scientific understanding of socialism with Chinese characteristics has important theoretical and practical significance.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“《资本论》历史唯物主义思想及其当代价值研究”(12XNJ013)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A81

【参考文献】