晚年马克思学术视野中的“公社及其土地制度”辨析——为先前两个学术论断所作的辩护
发布时间：2018-12-20 16:00
【摘要】：《再论马克思"柯瓦列夫斯基笔记"的主题》一文提出两个学术论断:晚年马克思对柯瓦列夫斯基《公社土地占有制》一书的读书笔记,其学术视野中的"公社"是一个微型的、浓缩的原始社会,是原始社会的细胞形态,"公社"的土地制度本质上是一种"原始社会的土地制度";笔记对印度、阿尔及利亚、美洲的公社及其土地制度的历史演变、衰落与解体过程及与此问题紧密关联的土地私有制的起源、形成,公社中私有土地的产生、发展问题的探讨,分别属于"原始社会研究"、"文明起源研究"的范畴。本文为这两个学术论断做了积极辩护,直接回应了读者阅读《再论马克思"柯瓦列夫斯基笔记"的主题》一文可能产生的疑问。本文重申:晚年马克思对柯瓦列夫斯基《公社土地占有制》一书所作的读书笔记,其主题、主旨并非探索"东方落后国家的发展道路、未来前景问题",而是探索"原始社会、文明起源问题"。澄清这一点,有助于合理认识该笔记的学术价值、历史地位,还原马克思晚年思想、晚年探索的本来面目。
[Abstract]:On the theme of Marx's Notes of Kovarevsky, two academic conclusions are put forward: Marx's notes on Kovarewski's book "Land tenure in the Commune" in his late years, The "commune" in his academic field of vision is a miniature, concentrated primitive society and the cell form of the primitive society. The land system of the "commune" is essentially a "primitive society's land system". Notes on the historical evolution of communes and their land systems in India, Algeria and America, the process of decline and disintegration and the origin and formation of private ownership of land closely related to this issue, the emergence and development of private land in communes, They belong to the category of primitive society study and civilization origin study. This paper actively defends these two academic arguments and directly responds to the questions that may arise from the reader's reading the theme of Marx's Notes of Kovarewski. This paper reiterates that the theme of Marx's notes on the land tenure of the commune in his late years is not to explore "the way of development of the backward countries in the East, the problems of the future prospects", but to explore "the primitive society." The Origin of Civilization. To clarify this point is helpful to understand the academic value and historical status of the note, to restore Marx's thoughts in his old age and to explore his true features in his later years.
【作者单位】： 北京大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目的资助 林锋主持的国家社会科学基金青年项目《晚年马克思五个重要笔记新探讨》(项目批准号:11CZX013)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：A81
本文编号：2388216
[Abstract]:On the theme of Marx's Notes of Kovarevsky, two academic conclusions are put forward: Marx's notes on Kovarewski's book "Land tenure in the Commune" in his late years, The "commune" in his academic field of vision is a miniature, concentrated primitive society and the cell form of the primitive society. The land system of the "commune" is essentially a "primitive society's land system". Notes on the historical evolution of communes and their land systems in India, Algeria and America, the process of decline and disintegration and the origin and formation of private ownership of land closely related to this issue, the emergence and development of private land in communes, They belong to the category of primitive society study and civilization origin study. This paper actively defends these two academic arguments and directly responds to the questions that may arise from the reader's reading the theme of Marx's Notes of Kovarewski. This paper reiterates that the theme of Marx's notes on the land tenure of the commune in his late years is not to explore "the way of development of the backward countries in the East, the problems of the future prospects", but to explore "the primitive society." The Origin of Civilization. To clarify this point is helpful to understand the academic value and historical status of the note, to restore Marx's thoughts in his old age and to explore his true features in his later years.
【作者单位】： 北京大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目的资助 林锋主持的国家社会科学基金青年项目《晚年马克思五个重要笔记新探讨》(项目批准号:11CZX013)的阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：A81
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 杨勤为;略论建国初期土地改革的特点及其胜利的意义[J];石油大学学报(社会科学版);1990年04期
，本文编号：2388216
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2388216.html
