马克思伦理批判思想研究
发布时间：2018-12-21 15:59
【摘要】：马克思伦理批判不是马克思社会历史观不成熟的简单标识,而是社会现实矛盾没有充分展开在认识上的体现；也没有随着唯物主义历史观之建立而真正退场,而是在历史辨证发展的客观过程中被赋予新的内涵和意义。马克思伦理批判从人本主义框架向历史唯物主义框架的转换从表面看是方法和视角的转换,而这种转换发生的深层根据在于伦理与经济的内在统一性。 本文试图通过对马克思伦理批判从抽象人本主义到具体历史唯物主义逻辑演进的历史分析,说明当下构建和谐社会的基石既不是单纯的经济建设,也不是一厢情愿的伦理建构,而是促进伦理与经济的良性互动和协调发展。追寻马克思伦理批判的时代背景和思想渊源,当时他受到了德国古典哲学、空想社会主义和古典政治经济学的影响。在马克思伦理批判的过程中,他经历了从人本主义视域向历史唯物主义的转换过程。在人本主义视域下,马克思从抽象类本质出发批判了私有制下异化劳动对人性和人与人的关系的扭曲,超越了黑格尔唯心主义和费尔巴哈人本主义。在历史唯物主义视域下,马克思从现实经济关系出发,透视商品、货币、资本、信用关系,揭示了资本主义社会的剥削实质,以及不平等、不自由的经济根源,实现了伦理批判路径和内容的变革。马克思伦理批判有其经济学深层语境,并与经济学研究协同推进。从本质上看,这种协同的动力源于伦理与经济的内在统一性。
[Abstract]:Marx's ethical criticism is not a simple sign of the immaturity of Marx's view of social history, but a reflection of the fact that the contradiction of social reality has not been fully developed in cognition. Nor did it exit with the establishment of historical materialism, but was endowed with new connotations and meanings in the objective process of historical dialectical development. The transformation of Marx's ethical criticism from humanism to historical materialism is on the surface the transformation of methods and perspectives, and the deep basis of this transformation lies in the internal unity of ethics and economy. Through the historical analysis of the logical evolution of Marx's ethical criticism from abstract humanism to concrete historical materialism, this paper attempts to show that the foundation stone of building a harmonious society at present is neither a simple economic construction nor a wishful ethical construction. It is to promote the benign interaction and harmonious development of ethics and economy. He was influenced by German classical philosophy, utopian socialism and classical political economy. In the process of Marx's ethical criticism, he experienced the transition from humanism to historical materialism. From the perspective of humanism, Marx criticized the distortion of human nature and human relations caused by alienated labor under private ownership, surpassing Hegel's idealism and Feuerbach's humanism. From the perspective of historical materialism, Marx, proceeding from the real economic relations, perspective the relationship among commodities, money, capital and credit, and reveals the essence of exploitation in capitalist society, as well as the economic root of inequality and inliberty. It realizes the reform of the path and content of ethics criticism. Marx's criticism of ethics has its deep context of economics and advances in coordination with the study of economics. In essence, the motive force of this synergy originates from the internal unity of ethics and economy.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：A811
本文编号：2389130
[Abstract]:Marx's ethical criticism is not a simple sign of the immaturity of Marx's view of social history, but a reflection of the fact that the contradiction of social reality has not been fully developed in cognition. Nor did it exit with the establishment of historical materialism, but was endowed with new connotations and meanings in the objective process of historical dialectical development. The transformation of Marx's ethical criticism from humanism to historical materialism is on the surface the transformation of methods and perspectives, and the deep basis of this transformation lies in the internal unity of ethics and economy. Through the historical analysis of the logical evolution of Marx's ethical criticism from abstract humanism to concrete historical materialism, this paper attempts to show that the foundation stone of building a harmonious society at present is neither a simple economic construction nor a wishful ethical construction. It is to promote the benign interaction and harmonious development of ethics and economy. He was influenced by German classical philosophy, utopian socialism and classical political economy. In the process of Marx's ethical criticism, he experienced the transition from humanism to historical materialism. From the perspective of humanism, Marx criticized the distortion of human nature and human relations caused by alienated labor under private ownership, surpassing Hegel's idealism and Feuerbach's humanism. From the perspective of historical materialism, Marx, proceeding from the real economic relations, perspective the relationship among commodities, money, capital and credit, and reveals the essence of exploitation in capitalist society, as well as the economic root of inequality and inliberty. It realizes the reform of the path and content of ethics criticism. Marx's criticism of ethics has its deep context of economics and advances in coordination with the study of economics. In essence, the motive force of this synergy originates from the internal unity of ethics and economy.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：A811
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周秀英;;马克思对资本主义伦理经济关系的批判[J];长春师范学院学报;2006年07期
2 余达淮;马克思对古典经济学等经济伦理思想的批判与继承[J];道德与文明;2005年02期
3 陆昱;;马克思恩格斯发展伦理思想探析[J];湖北社会科学;2010年02期
4 郑元景;;从伦理、意识形态批判到政治经济学批判——马克思现代性批判视角的转换[J];福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年02期
5 唐正东;;对蒲鲁东的批判给马克思带来了什么?——《哲学的贫困》的思想史地位辨析[J];江苏社会科学;2010年02期
6 张志兵;米华;;论马克思主义的人权伦理[J];求索;2010年02期
7 李建立;马克思经济学研究中的伦理视角——兼论经济伦理研究的现代进展[J];人文杂志;2003年03期
8 曾志浩;;人性假设、伦理批判与“以人为本”——论《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的理论缺失及现实意义[J];社科纵横;2006年01期
9 段方乐;;从经验唯物主义、社会唯物主义到历史唯物主义——历史唯物主义方法论探源[J];泰安教育学院学报岱宗学刊;2005年04期
10 李萍;;日本马克思主义伦理思想形态论[J];日本学刊;2010年04期
，本文编号：2389130
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2389130.html
