北京市计划生育困难人群不良情绪状况及相关因素

发布时间：2018-03-09 12:20

本文选题：不良情绪　切入点：计划生育困难　出处：《中国公共卫生》2013年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的了解北京市计划生育困难人群不良情绪特点及相关影响因素,为有针对性进行干预提供依据。方法采用方便抽样法抽取北京市人口计划生育委员会登记的"计划生育困难家庭"295人和一般对照家庭112人进行一般情况和不良情绪问卷调查。结果计划生育困难组焦虑、抑郁、孤独、生理不良和总体不良情绪维度得分分别为(2.66±0.75)、(2.64±0.88)、(2.02±0.95)、(2.25±0.80)和(2.29±0.75)分,高于正常对照组的(2.37±0.91)、(2.35±0.89)、(1.64±0.71)、(1.92±0.58)和(2.01±0.54)分,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05);不孕组焦虑、抑郁、敌对、恐惧、不良生理和总体不良情绪维度得分高于子女重病伤残组,不孕组抑郁维度得分高于失独组,失独组恐惧和生理不良维度得分高于子女重病伤残组(均P0.05);经济状况较差组和经济状况一般组焦虑、抑郁、孤独、不良生理和总体不良情绪维度得分高于经济状况较好组,差异均有统计意义(均P0.05),但在恐惧维度上,经济状况一般组[(2.39±1.14)分]高于较好组[(1.99±0.97)分],差异有统计学意义(P0.05);计划生育困难组中,女性抑郁和敌对维度得分分别为(2.79±1.10)和(2.12±1.04)分,高于男性的(2.51±1.06)和(1.97±1.03)分,高中及以下学历者焦虑和孤独维度得分分别为(2.73±2.64)和(2.08±0.95)分,高于大专及以上学历者的(2.50±1.12)和(1.86±0.93)分,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论计划生育困难人群不良情绪较一般人群突出,不同生育创伤、性别、经济状况、学历计划生育困难人群的不良情绪表现及程度有差异。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the characteristics of bad emotions and related influencing factors among the population with family planning difficulties in Beijing. Methods 295 family planning families registered by Beijing population and Family Planning Commission and 112 general control families were selected for general and adverse conditions. Results the anxiety of family planning difficulty group, The scores of depression, loneliness, poor physiology and overall bad mood were 2.66 卤0.75 卤0.88 and 2.02 卤0.85 respectively, and 2.29 卤0.75), which were higher than those in the normal control group (2.37 卤0.91) and 2.35 卤0.891.64 卤0.71 卤0.58 and 2.01 卤0.54, respectively (all P0.05P; anxiety, depression, hostility, fear in infertile group). The scores of bad physiology and general bad emotion were higher than those of children with severe illness and disability, and the scores of depression in infertile group were higher than those in lost group. The scores of anxiety, depression, loneliness, bad physiology and overall bad emotion in the group of poor economic condition and general group of economic condition were higher than those of the group with good economic condition, the scores of fear and bad physiological dimension in the group of loss of independence were higher than those in the group with severe illness and disability (all P < 0.05). The differences were statistically significant (all P 0.05, but in the fear dimension, the scores of economic status in the general group [2.39 卤1.14)] were higher than those in the better group [1.99 卤0.97], the scores of depression and hostility were 2.79 卤1.10 and 2.12 卤1.04 in the group of family planning difficulties, respectively. The scores of anxiety and loneliness were 2.73 卤2.64) and 2.08 卤0.95) in senior high school students and below, and 2.50 卤1.12) and 1.86 卤0.93 in high school students and those with college degree or above, respectively, and the scores of anxiety and loneliness were 2.51 卤1.06) and 1.97 卤1.03 in males, and 2.73 卤2.64 and 2.08 卤0.95 in senior high school students, respectively. Conclusion there are significant differences in the bad emotions of the population with family planning difficulties compared with the general population, different reproductive trauma, gender, economic situation, and the poor emotional performance and degree of the population with educational background and family planning difficulties.
【作者单位】：中山大学城市社会研究中心;中山大学社会科学调查中心;北京师范大学;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(12YJA840002)
【分类号】：B842.6;C924.21

【参考文献】