流动人口权利救济选择倾向的实证分析

发布时间：2018-04-19 17:31

本文选题：流动人口 + 权利救济　；参考：《当代世界与社会主义》2013年04期

【摘要】：2012年10月—2013年1月,本课题组在北京、广东、浙江、湖北、重庆等地就流动人口权利救济问题采用问卷调查与访谈相结合的方法展开了实地调查。调查表明,流动人口和户籍人口对于权利救济的认知,对于各种权利救济手段的信任度,以及对于自身权利受到侵害后权利救济手段的选择方面,并没有明显差异;流动人口也没有表现出更多地寻求私力救济或者暴力维权的倾向;流动人口对于权利救济的选择表现出多样性,并没有对于某种手段的特别偏好。基于以上结论,我们建议:不应过度强调和渲染流动人口与当地户籍人口在权利救济方面的差异,特别是不能对流动人口存有偏见;要积极引导并创造条件使流动人口更快地融入当地社会;要疏通权利救济的多种渠道,避免权利救济的极端情况发生。
[Abstract]:From October 2012 to January 2013, our group conducted a field investigation on the rights relief of floating population in Beijing, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Hubei, Chongqing and so on.The investigation shows that there is no obvious difference in the cognition of the right relief between the floating population and the household registration population, the trust degree of various right relief means, and the choice of the right relief means after the infringement of their own rights.The floating population did not show the tendency to seek private remedy or violence to protect rights, and the choice of right relief showed diversity, and there was no special preference for some means.Based on the above conclusions, we suggest that we should not over-emphasize and exaggerate the difference between the floating population and the local resident population in the relief of their rights, especially we should not have prejudice against the floating population;It is necessary to actively guide and create conditions for the floating population to integrate into the local society more quickly, and to dredge various channels of right relief so as to avoid extreme situations of right relief.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学国际关系学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“中国流动人口权利救济问题研究”(项目编号:10YJA810031)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：C922

【相似文献】