“有学”“无学”之辨:20世纪初“科学”标准下的中学自省

发布时间：2018-01-27 05:05

本文关键词： “有学” “无学” 科学中学　出处：《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：20世纪初年,学界曾经发生过一场关于中国是否"有学"的讨论。讨论由梁启超发起,《新世界学报》、《大陆》回应。三方均欲依傍西学的分科概念反省中学,但在模糊的"科学"标准下,梁启超认为中国古代"有学",近代"无学",欲以"科学"为榜样,对旧学新之而不弃之;《新世界学报》认为中国古已"有学",只需复兴古学,保存国粹即可;《大陆》则认为中国根本"无学",应径取欧美之学以替代中学。中国学人在兴学道路上的分歧实际上是在相同的西学话语中自我体认的差异,折射出他们面对东西学术时自卑而又不甘落后的矛盾心态。
[Abstract]:In the early years of 20th century, there was a discussion on whether there was any "learning" in China. The discussion was initiated by Liang Qichao, "New World Journal". In response, the three parties wanted to reflect on the concept of "western learning", but under the vague standard of "science", Liang Qichao thought that in ancient China there was "learning", and in modern times "no study", and that they wanted to follow the example of "science". To learn the old new and not to abandon it; The Journal of the New World holds that ancient China has "learned", so it is only necessary to revive ancient learning and preserve the quintessence of the nation. "the mainland" holds that China has no study at all, and should take the European and American schools instead of the middle schools. In fact, the differences in the path of the Chinese scholars' learning are in fact the differences of self-recognition in the same western language. Reflects that they face East-West academic inferiority complex and not willing to lag behind the ambivalence.
【作者单位】：杭州师范大学;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“近代中国的知识和制度转型”(05JZD00011)
【分类号】：K092
【正文快照】： “科学”一词在中国古已有之,特指“科举之学”①。近代出现的“科学”与原来的科举之义绝非一事②,严格而论,它是一个前所未有的新概念。以往研究多拿“格致”与“科学”对应③,不免以偏盖全。现有研究显示,近代“科学”一词来自日本④。日本用“科学”译sciense,因其有“分

【参考文献】