米罗诺夫的《俄国社会史》研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 17:10

本文选题：米罗诺夫　切入点：《俄国社会史》　出处：《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：苏联解体后,政府展开了一系列大刀阔斧的改革,民主化进程加快。随着绝密档案的大量公开、西方社会史思想的传入,俄国的历史研究也进入了新时期。认识帝俄时期的历史,是以时间的先后顺序对历史材料进行编纂的传统方法研究,还是像西方新史学那样,使用新材料采用新方法在研究中寻求突破,这引起学术界长期的思考探索。经过长期的反思与实践,俄国历史学家认识到运用社会学方法,即“自下而上”的方式去探究俄国历史是非常重要且必要的。社会史研究不仅促进了史学方法论的更新,还在一定程度上克服了史学研究的片面性,历史不再只是透过“大人物”的意志才能展现,其也可以通过“自下而上”的方式,以小见大地说明问题。米罗诺夫就是其中的代表人物。本文试图以米氏《俄国社会史》为出发点来分析18—20世纪初帝俄时期的社会情况。本文正文共四部分。引言部分主要对国内外史学界关于米罗诺夫的《俄国社会史》的研究现状做了详细梳理;第一部分主要介绍了米罗诺夫的生平、求学写作的经历以及对《俄国社会史》内容的概要;第二部分介绍米罗诺夫社会史思想的源起,即俄国社会史研究的传统和西方新史学思想的影响,以及米罗诺夫对当代俄国社会史的反思;第三部分讲述米罗诺夫《俄国社会史》的编纂特色,从《俄国社会史》的研究对象、研究范式、研究方法这三方面立论;第四部分是米罗诺夫《俄国社会史》的学术意义,表现在对研究领域的开拓、研究主题的延展、研究理论的启迪;结语部分,总结通过对《俄国社会史》的分析,使读者了解到18—20世纪初俄国的社会现实,进而对本书做出客观评价。米罗诺夫的《俄国社会史》改变了固有的“自上而下”的历史编纂学传统,从社会史的角度以小见大地分析历史问题,这种研究方法在现代的学术研究中依然具有重要的参考价值和借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the government launched a series of drastic reforms and the democratization process accelerated. The historical study of Russia has also entered a new period. To understand the history of the imperial Russia period, is it a traditional method of compiling historical materials in the order of time, or is it just like the Western new historiography? The use of new materials and new methods in search of breakthroughs in research has led to a long period of reflection and exploration in the academic community. After a long period of reflection and practice, Russian historians realized the use of sociological methods. That is, "bottom-up" approach to explore Russian history is very important and necessary. The study of social history not only promotes the updating of historical methodology, but also overcomes the one-sidedness of historical research to a certain extent. History can no longer be shown only through the will of the "big man", but also through the "bottom-up" approach. Mironov is one of the representative figures. This paper attempts to analyze the social situation in the early 18-20 century period of Russia from the point of view of Meez "Russian Social History". There are four parts in the text of this paper. The introduction is the main text of this paper. Part of the history of the domestic and foreign scholars about Mironov's "Russian Social History" research status quo has been made a detailed combing; The first part mainly introduces Mironov's life, writing experience and the summary of Russian Social History. The second part introduces the origin of Mironov's social history thought. That is, the tradition of Russian social history research and the influence of western new historiography thought, and Mironov's reflection on contemporary Russian social history. The third part describes the compilation characteristics of Mironov's Russian Social History. The 4th part is the academic significance of Mironov's Social History of Russia, which is manifested in the development of the research field and the extension of the research theme. In the conclusion part, through the analysis of the History of Russian Society, the readers can understand the social reality of Russia in the early 18-20 century. Mironov's "Russian Social History" has changed the inherent tradition of "top-down" historiography. From the perspective of social history, it can be seen from the perspective of social history that the historical problems are analyzed as a whole. This research method still has the important reference value and the reference significance in the modern academic research.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K091

【参考文献】