略说中国上古的史官传统

发布时间：2018-03-13 18:13

本文选题：史官　切入点：实录　出处：《中国典籍与文化》2011年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文通过对前人关于上古史官身份和职责讨论的梳理,认为上古史官的传统并非如班固所说"实录"。上古史官职能本与王室的祭祀活动相关,无论执简册或簿书或笔,均与这个活动有关。无论简册还是簿书都是用来记录活动的,担当这个工作当然应是史官。认为史官不记事,可能不一定正确。史官记事亦只是如实记录活动而已,这时还没有隐恶与否的问题。因此班固所说的史官"不隐恶、不虚美"的实录原则,其实是要求在儒家思想指导下的"实录",而不是我们所理解的如实记录。上古史官没有隐恶与虚美的道德需求,所以也就无所谓不隐恶、不虚美。因此我们说上古史官的实录,与春秋以后的"实录"是有着本质的区分的。
[Abstract]:By combing the previous discussions on the status and duties of the ancient historians, this paper holds that the tradition of the ancient officials is not "factual records" as Ban Gu said. The official posts of the ancient history are related to the sacrificial activities of the royal family, regardless of whether they hold a book or a book or a pen. It is all related to this activity. Whether the book or the book is used to record activities, of course, it should be a historian's job. It may not necessarily be correct for a historian not to take note of things. A historian's diary is also just a truthful record of an activity. At this time, there was no question of whether evil was hidden or not. Therefore, as Ban Gu put it, the historical official's principle of "not hiding evil, not false beauty" is the actual record principle. In fact, it requires the "record of truth" under the guidance of Confucianism, not the truthful record as we understand it. There is no moral need for hidden evil and virtual beauty for ancient historians, so there is no need to hide evil, not beauty. Therefore, we say the record of the official of ancient history. And after the Spring and Autumn period, there is an essential distinction between the actual record.
【作者单位】：韩国外国语大学;
【基金】：韩国外国语大学2011年科研基金支持
【分类号】：K092

【共引文献】