中共党史、当代中国史研究的方法论视角——兼议布罗代尔“整体性历史”与“历史时间”的引入

发布时间：2018-04-10 20:52

本文选题：中共党史 + 国史研究　；参考：《党史研究与教学》2012年06期

【摘要】：国史与党史研究存在高度的契合性。当代中国史的核心内容显然是由党的历史构成的。随着当代史研究局面的逐步形成,历史的"先验性"命题开始向"当代性"命题转变。由于缺乏在政治性党史、国史研究与学术性党史、国史研究之间构筑一种合作的途径,因此,当下的党史与国史研究似乎陷入了一种由"重(新)写历史"到"历史重(复)写"的循环,而无法跳出政治对历史功能过度诉求的窠臼,导致研究的单一化。针对这一现状,本文强调借用布罗代尔的"整体性历史"与"历史时间"理论的适宜性,并对其"长时段"模式进行适当地改造,以拓展中共党史与国史研究的视角。
[Abstract]:There is a high degree of agreement between the history of the state and the study of the history of the Party.The core content of contemporary Chinese history is obviously composed of the history of the Party.With the gradual formation of the research situation of contemporary history, the "transcendental" proposition of history began to change to the "contemporary" proposition.Because of the lack of a way to build a cooperative relationship between political party history, national history research and academic party history, national history research,The current study of party history and national history seems to be in a cycle from "rewriting history" to "rewriting history", but it can not break out of the pattern of excessive political demands on historical function, leading to the simplification of research.In view of the present situation, this paper emphasizes the appropriateness of borrowing Brodale's theory of "holistic history" and "historical time", and reconstructs its "long-term" model in order to expand the perspective of the study of the history of the Communist Party of China and the state.
【作者单位】：中央民族大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：K06

【参考文献】