文本的叙述、解释与评论——评周祥森著《反映与建构——历史认识论问题研究》

发布时间：2018-05-01 23:38

本文选题：历史认识论 + 个体—社会机制　；参考：《史学月刊》2011年06期

【摘要】：周祥森教授的《反映与建构——历史认识论问题研究》一书,对改革开放以来的历史认识论问题研究做了较为系统的检讨。著者做了艰苦的资料爬梳工作,对历史认识论范畴所涉及的"历史认识运动的个体—社会机制"、"历史认识客体与历史事实的多重性"诸领域的研究进行了阐释。通过从体例、方法和内容三个层面对该书展开讨论,可以发现,学术史的研究方法是文本的解释,认识主体总是从个人的处境和社会的需要去看待认识客体的,主体与客体的双向交互运动构成历史认识过程的核心矛盾与本质特征,因此著者提出主客体双向交互运动的主张有其重要的学理意义。该书不仅对于我们厘清历史认识论这一问题本身有着重要意义,更重要的是有助于推进史学界各个专门领域的具体研究,促进史学实践和历史认识论之间的良性互动。
[Abstract]:The study of Historical epistemology by Professor Zhou Xiangsen has made a systematic review on the study of Historical epistemology since the reform and opening up. The author has done the hard work, has explained the historical epistemology category involves "the historical cognition movement individual-social mechanism", "the history cognition object and the historical fact multiplicity" and so on the research field has carried on the explanation. By discussing the book from three aspects of style, method and content, it can be found that the research method of academic history is the interpretation of the text, and the cognitive subject is always looking at the cognitive object from the perspective of the individual situation and the needs of the society. The bi-directional interaction between subject and object constitutes the core contradiction and essential feature of the historical cognition process. Therefore, the author's proposition of two-way interaction between subject and object has important theoretical significance. The book is not only of great significance for us to clarify the problem of historical epistemology itself, but also helps to promote the specific research in various specialized fields of history, and to promote the positive interaction between historical practice and historical epistemology.
【作者单位】：江苏行政学院;南京大学历史系;
【分类号】：K02

【参考文献】