论顾颉刚对唯物史观的态度

发布时间：2018-05-12 00:07

本文选题：顾颉刚 + 新历史考据学派　；参考：《史学史研究》2013年03期

【摘要】：民国时期,顾颉刚以"我们"与"他们"来划分新历史考据学派与马克思主义史学派的学术边界,对唯物史观采取"敬而远之"的态度,主张"分工合作"论,坚持各自不同的学术道路,缺乏主动交流与实质合作。新中国时期,顾颉刚经历了"从抗拒改造到接受改造"的心路历程,既要进行自我否定与批判,努力接受唯物史观,又无法完全放弃自己的学术理念,呈现出"融而不入"的矛盾状态。新历史考据学派的史学价值观塑造了顾颉刚对唯物史观的基本态度,虽然他不断进行调整,但这种价值观与马克思主义史学价值观的异趣还是成为他思想痛苦的根源。顾颉刚对唯物史观态度的演变,反映了中国现代史学格局的变迁,也折射出中国史家寻求史学现代化、探索现代史学不同范式的努力。无论是科学史学范式,还是马克思主义史学范式,都有其历史的和学术的价值,而史学现代化则需要多元化的存在与探索。
[Abstract]:In the period of the Republic of China, Gu Jiegang used "us" and "them" to demarcate the academic boundary between the new historical textual school and the Marxist historical school, and adopted an attitude of "respecting the historical materialism" and advocating the theory of "division of work and cooperation". Adhere to their different academic path, lack of active communication and substantive cooperation. During the period of New China, Gu Jiegang experienced the mental process of "from resisting transformation to accepting transformation". He not only negated and criticized himself, tried hard to accept historical materialism, but also couldn't give up his academic ideas completely. Present the contradictory state of "melt but do not enter". The historical values of the new historical textual school have shaped Gu Jiegang's basic attitude to historical materialism. Although he constantly adjusts this kind of values and Marxist historical values are the root of his thought pain. The evolution of Gu Jiegang's attitude towards historical materialism reflects the change of the pattern of Chinese modern historiography, and also reflects the efforts of Chinese historians to seek the modernization of historiography and to explore different paradigms of modern historiography. Both the paradigm of scientific historiography and the paradigm of Marxist historiography have their historical and academic value, and the modernization of historiography needs diversified existence and exploration.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K03

【共引文献】