论宏观历史研究借用二手材料的界限及风险防范

发布时间：2018-05-14 17:13

本文选题：宏观历史研究 + 二手材料　；参考：《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年06期

【摘要】：历史研究中,原始材料的评价标准具有唯一性,而使用二手材料又是一个普遍的做法,尤其是单个史学家在社会需要、在全球史编撰等的相互作用下,面对无限的材料,必需借用二手材料进行宏观历史研究。要解决这一矛盾,要明确必需不是随意,更不是滥用;其界限是适用于历史理论和历史思想的探索、宏观历史比较研究和大型综合史书编撰三大领域。唯有如此,宏观历史研究才能在历史理论和历史比较以及历史多样化解释等方面有所创新和贡献,充分展现其史学意义,促进实现史学社会功能。宏观历史研究借用二手材料存在风险,借用必须以新意为依归。通过坚持研究目标服从材料的原则,坚守学术规范等,防范风险还是有希望的。
[Abstract]:In the historical study, the evaluation standard of raw materials is unique, and the use of second-hand materials is a common practice, especially for a single historian in the social needs, under the interaction of the world history compilation, and in the face of unlimited materials, the use of second-hand materials must be used in the macro historical study. To solve this contradiction, it is necessary to make clear the necessity of not It is arbitrary and not abused; its boundary is the exploration of historical theory and historical thought, the comparative study of macro history and the compilation of large comprehensive history books in three fields. Only in this way, the study of macro history can make innovations and contributions in historical theory, historical comparison and historical interpretation, and fully display its historical meaning. It promotes the realization of the social function of historiography. Macro historical research borrows the risk of secondhand materials and borrows from the new meaning. By adhering to the principles of the research objectives, adhering to the academic standards and so on, the prevention of risk is still hopeful.

【作者单位】：华南师范大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】