历史学视野中的现代化
发布时间:2018-05-19 07:53
本文选题:历史学 + 视野 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2006年硕士论文
【摘要】: 本文试图运用历史学的方法、从历史学的角度来回答什么是现代化这个问题。第一步,运用历史学追本溯源的方法,以现代化这个学术术语的来龙去脉及其基本内涵为中心,对各种现代化理论和观点进行简单的梳理,探讨各家观点的得失,分析不同时代、不同人群对现代化的不同理解,从而获得理论上的一般认识。在这一部分中,本文以时间为经、以内容或地域为纬,将各种现代化理论分为三大板块。首先探讨了20世纪30年代中国学者的现代化观。接着分析了国外社会科学界对现代化的理解:包括西方50年代兴起的经典现代化理论和稍晚作为第三世界声音出现的依附论,并附带涉及了70年代以后出现的世界体系理论和新比较政治经济学研究。最后分析了一下马克思主义的现代化观,重点探讨了中国共产党人对现代化的理解。第二步,带着对现代化的一般认识,去审视和解读人类历史进程,在历史演变的脉络和历史事实中去发现和寻找现代化。在审视和解读历史的同时,也不断修正原先的理论认识。在这一部分中,本文将1500年以来的人类历史分为四个阶段,描述了现代化从区域性运动走向世界性运动的发展历程,探讨了世界主要国家的现代化经历和得失,揭示了现代化运动和人类历史从分散走向整体之进程的内在一致性。第三步,在对理论和历史的双重审视中,用理论来观照历史,用历史来检验理论,在两者的互动中求得一种历史学视野中的现代化观。其实,这一步早已蕴含在第一步和第二步中。本文的最后部分还略述了一点对中国现代化的思考。
[Abstract]:This article tries to use the method of history to answer the question of what is modernization from the perspective of history. The first step is to use the method of tracing the origin of history, taking the origin and basic connotation of the modern academic terms as the center, to make a simple combing of various modern theories and viewpoints, and to discuss the viewpoints of each family. Loss, the analysis of different times, different people of different understanding of the modernization, so as to get a general understanding of the theory. In this part, this article is divided into three major parts of the modernization theory with time, content or region. First, it discusses the modernization view of Chinese scholars in the 1930s. Then it analyses the foreign social sciences. The understanding of the modernization of the academic circle: the theory of classical modernization and the adherence to the appearance of the third world in the West in the 50s, and incidental to the theory of world system and the study of new comparative political economics that appeared after the 70s. Finally, it analyzes the Marx's concept of modernization and focuses on the Chinese Communist Party. To understand the modernization of the party, the second step, with the general understanding of modernization, examines and interprets the process of human history, discovers and seeks modernization in the context of historical evolution and historical facts. While reviewing and interpreting history, it is constantly revising the original theoretical understanding. In this part, this article will be in the 1500. The human history is divided into four stages. It describes the development course of modernization from regional movement to world movement, probes into the modernization experience and gains and losses of the major countries in the world, and reveals the internal consistency of the modernization movement and the process of human history from decentralization to the whole. The third step is in the dual examination of theory and history, We use the theory to look at history, test the theory with history, and find a modern view of history in the interaction of the two. In fact, this step has already been contained in the first and second steps. The last part of this article also outlines some thoughts on the modernization of China.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:K03
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 钱乘旦;以现代化为主题构建世界近现代史新的学科体系[J];世界历史;2003年03期
2 顾海兵;“现代化研究”离科学有多远?[J];科学中国人;2002年09期
3 吴忠民;形成现代化研究的中国流派——中国现代化研究的回顾与前瞻[J];理论前沿;2001年06期
4 琼岛;“东亚国家和地区现代化进程”国际学术研讨会纪实[J];史学理论研究;2004年03期
5 董正华;从历史发展多线性到史学范式多样化——围绕“以一元多线论为基础的现代化范式”的讨论[J];史学月刊;2004年05期
6 邹兆辰;从英国史研究到世界现代化进程研究——访钱乘旦教授[J];史学月刊;2004年10期
7 汪晖;当代中国的思想状况与现代性问题[J];文艺争鸣;1998年06期
8 王思睿;现代化与人类文明主流[J];战略与管理;1999年02期
,本文编号:1909307
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/1909307.html