史学建构中文学化与科学化趋向平议——以史景迁的史著为例

发布时间：2018-05-19 17:05

本文选题：史学建构 + 史料　；参考：《福建论坛(人文社会科学版)》2017年08期

【摘要】："泛史料"意识下史料趋于文学化,这弥补了民史史料的缺乏甚至匮乏的现状,是伴随史家"眼光向下"的治史理念应运而生的。在强调科学化、规范化的严谨分析模式下,合理的历史想象、富于文学性的历史叙事方法之勃兴拓展了史学的传播和影响力。文学化叙述描写与科学化剖析解释本不冲突矛盾,更无优劣之分,均是史学构建过程的两个方面,史家因治史理念、侧重等不同各有选择,文史界限之存在自是必然,可言辞之使用则为共通,在维护史学本质的基础上或执其一端或兼融相通,都应被历史研究所包容,毕竟多元方可能造就生机。
[Abstract]:Under the consciousness of "pan-historical materials", historical materials tend to be literary, which makes up for the lack or even lack of historical materials of the people, and comes into being with the historian's idea of "looking down". Under the rigorous analysis mode which emphasizes the scientific and standardized, the rational historical imagination and the flourishing of the literary historical narrative method expand the dissemination and influence of the historiography. The description of literary narration and the explanation of scientific analysis do not conflict with each other, let alone the advantages and disadvantages, are two aspects of the construction process of historiography. Historians have their own choices because of the idea and emphasis of managing history, so the existence of the boundary of literary history is inevitable. The use of words is common. On the basis of preserving the essence of historiography or holding its one end or both, it should be tolerated by the Institute of History, after all, pluralism may create vitality.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K05

【相似文献】