儒学叙事下的中国史——以明治时期日本的汉文中国史著作为中心

发布时间：2018-06-14 23:25

本文选题：文明-进步叙事 + 民族-国家叙事　；参考：《江苏社会科学》2016年03期

【摘要】：明治维新后,在西方近代史学的影响下,日本出现了两种中国史叙事模式,即文明-进步叙事和民族-国家叙事。前者依据进化史观,将中国历史描述为"停滞之史";后者则将中国史纳入"东洋"诸民族竞争之史。本文通过对那珂通世《支那通史》等13部明治时期日本人用汉文编纂的中国史著作之文本分析,指出在明治史学中还存在着第三种叙事模式,即中国传统的儒家历史叙事。明治汉文中国史大都以中国史籍为"底本",使用中国帝王年号、以春秋笔法叙事、基于以中原王朝为中心的天下观念叙述中国与周边的关系。那珂通世《支那通史》虽然采用了西方万国史之章节体,但是,其时空表述仍然体现了儒家传统的历史意识。这一事实提醒我们,在讨论"明治维新"、"文明开化"等问题时,应避免落入西方近代学术体系的认识论窠臼。
[Abstract]:After the Meiji Restoration, under the influence of western modern historiography, two kinds of Chinese history narrative modes appeared in Japan, that is, civilization-progressive narrative and national-state narrative. The former describes Chinese history as "the history of stagnation" according to the view of evolutionary history, while the latter takes the history of Chinese history into the history of "Oriental" ethnic competition. Based on the text analysis of 13 Japanese works on Chinese history compiled in Chinese by the Japanese in Meiji period, the author points out that there is a third narrative mode in Meiji historiography, that is, the Chinese traditional Confucian historical narration. Most of the Chinese history of the Meiji Chinese language is based on the Chinese historical books, using the title of the emperor of China, narrating with the style of the Spring and Autumn Dynasty, and narrating the relationship between China and its periphery on the basis of the concept of the world centered on the Central Plains Dynasty. Although Nakotong's General History of ** adopts the chapters of western history, its space-time expression still embodies the historical consciousness of Confucian tradition. This fact reminds us that we should avoid falling into the epistemological rut of modern western academic system when discussing the problems of "Meiji Restoration" and "Civilization".
【作者单位】：日本爱知县立大学外语学部;
【基金】：“南京大学亚太发展研究中心”学术项目资助
【分类号】：K093.13

【相似文献】