章太炎《春秋》学三变考论——兼论章氏“六经皆史”说的本意

发布时间：2018-06-25 11:58

本文选题：章太炎 + 《春秋》学　；参考：《史学史研究》2012年01期

【摘要】：经学消亡,其所述历史"神话"被否定,经学作为史料寄身于史学门下。按照中国学术"古今之变"的这一大线索来看,章太炎的"六经皆史"说对于中国学术、思想的现代转型具有里程碑式的地位和意义。自新文化运动以来,后世学者基本上按照这一线索将章太炎以"六经皆史"为要义的"古文经学"进行一分为二的评说:一方面肯定章太炎破除由经见道、通经致用的经学思维,将"六经"历史文献化,使儒家六经从神圣宝典下降到了古史资料地位。另一方面,又批评其"六经皆史"之说终未能脱离儒家经学的羁绊,仍为尊经崇圣的观念所困。这样一种以"传统/现代"为框架的二分法往往使我们忽略章太炎"古文经学"形成发展的内在轨迹和自身意图,从而造成对章太炎学术思想的割裂和简化。章太炎的《春秋》、《左传》学是其"古文经学"的主干,最能表现其"古文经学"形成发展的内在自身的思想轨迹。本文试图追迹章氏《春秋》学的变化发展,并以《春秋》学为中心,考察其"六经皆史"说的本意,提示其中值得重新审视的思想内涵。
[Abstract]:Because of the disappearance of Confucian classics, the mythology of history was denied, and the study of classics as historical materials was placed under the branch of historiography. According to the clue of Chinese academic "the change of ancient and modern", Zhang Taiyan's "six Classics are History" has a landmark status and significance for the modern transformation of Chinese academic and ideological. Since the New Cultural Movement, scholars of later generations have basically divided Zhang Taiyan's "Ancient Classics and Classics", which means "six Classics are History", into two according to this clue: on the one hand, he affirmed that Zhang Taiyan was able to break down the Tao of the Classics. The thinking of the Confucian classics which leads to the use of the classics makes the six Classics of Confucianism fall from the sacred treasure to the information status of ancient history. On the other hand, he criticized his theory of "six Classics as History", which failed to break away from the fetters of Confucian Classics, and was still trapped by the concept of respecting the scriptures and worshipping the saints. Such a dichotomy with the frame of "tradition / modern" often makes us ignore the inner track and its own intention of the formation and development of Zhang Taiyan's "Classical Classics", thus resulting in the separation and simplification of Zhang Taiyan's academic thought. Zhang Taiyan's "Spring and Autumn" and "Zuo Zhuan" are the backbone of his "Classical Classics", which can best express the inner thought track of the formation and development of his "Classical Classics". This paper attempts to trace the change and development of Zhang's "Spring and Autumn" study, and with the "Spring and Autumn" study as the center, examines the original meaning of his "six Classics are History" theory, and suggests that it is worth reexamining the ideological connotation.
【作者单位】：首都师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】