历史编纂的理论自觉——《史通》、《文史通义》比较研究略论

发布时间：2018-06-28 16:56

本文选题：《史通》 + 《文史通义》　；参考：《人文杂志》2010年03期

【摘要】：《史通》和《文史通义》是中国古代史学评论的双璧,共同反映出历史编纂的理论自觉。刘知V、章学诚二人都重视总结史学演进的经验和教训,以理论的创新推进著史实践的发展;二人都具有强烈的批判意识,都有独到的哲学思想作指导,重"独断"之学,重"别识心裁"。刘知V处在断代史正史纂修的高峰期,他承担的主要使命是总结以往、提出著述的范式,他提出的范畴、命题内涵丰富,且颇具体系性。章学诚则处于正史末流在编纂上陷于困境阶段,其主要任务是开出新路,他洞察当时史识、史学、史才都成为史例的奴隶之严重积弊,又发现晚出的纪事本末体因事命篇的优点正是救治之良方,主张大力改造纪传体,创立新的体裁,其论述具有深刻的哲理性和明显的超前性。
[Abstract]:"Shi Tong" and "Wen Shi Tong Yi" are two pieces of Chinese ancient historiography review, which jointly reflect the theoretical consciousness of historical compilation. Liu Zhi V, Zhang Xue Cheng two people all attach importance to summing up the experience and lessons of the evolution of history, and propelling the development of historical practice with the innovation of theory; the two people all have a strong sense of criticism, and all have unique philosophical ideas as guidance. " Zhang Xuecheng is in the peak period of the compilation of the history of the history of broken generation. His main mission is to sum up the past, to put forward the paradigm of his writings, and to put forward the category, the propositional connotation is rich and systematic. Zhang Xuecheng is in the difficult position of the last history of the history, and his main task is to open a new road and his insight At that time, history, history and history have all become the serious pros and malpractices of the slaves of the history example, and found that the merits of the late chronicle and the end body are the good remedy for the treatment, advocating the reform of the chronicle and the creation of a new genre, which have profound philosophical and obvious advance.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院史学研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“中国历史编纂学的演进路径、优良传统和当代价值研究”(09AZS001)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K092

【共引文献】