顾颉刚致罗根泽信札十通
发布时间：2018-08-12 10:16
【摘要】：湖南图书馆藏有顾颉刚致罗根泽亲笔信函十通,写作年代大致为1932年至1935年间。信札中顾颉刚就《古史辨》的选题内容、编纂体例、校稿审核、出版发行、经费来源等诸多细节与罗根泽往复讨论,如是否选入章太炎、胡适治经治子之方法异同,是否摘抄胡适《中国哲学史大纲》、蔡元培《中国伦理学史》等书中有关诸子研究的代表性观点等等,既表明顾颉刚先生《古史辨》编纂中重视鉴别和吸收晚近兴起的哲学、史学、社会学新知识理论的现代性史学思想,也反映出国难当头、时局纷扰下学者苦心孤诣,延续学术文脉的勇气和艰难情形。
[Abstract]:There are ten letters written by Gu Jiegang to Luo Genze in Hunan Library, which were written from 1932 to 1935. In the letter, Gu Jiegang discussed with Luo Genze many details about the content of the topic, compilation style, review and approval of manuscripts, publication and distribution, source of funds, etc., such as whether to choose Zhang Taiyan or Hu Shi to treat his children. Whether or not to copy the representative viewpoints on the studies of the philosophers in Hu Shi's outline of Chinese philosophy, Cai Yuanpei's History of Chinese Ethics, and so on, shows that the compilation of Gu Gang's Ancient History shows that he attaches importance to the identification and absorption of the philosophy that has arisen recently. The modern historiography thought of historiography and new knowledge theory of sociology also reflects the courage and difficulty of the academic context.
【作者单位】： 湖南图书馆历史文献部;
【分类号】：K092
，
本文编号：2178750
[Abstract]:There are ten letters written by Gu Jiegang to Luo Genze in Hunan Library, which were written from 1932 to 1935. In the letter, Gu Jiegang discussed with Luo Genze many details about the content of the topic, compilation style, review and approval of manuscripts, publication and distribution, source of funds, etc., such as whether to choose Zhang Taiyan or Hu Shi to treat his children. Whether or not to copy the representative viewpoints on the studies of the philosophers in Hu Shi's outline of Chinese philosophy, Cai Yuanpei's History of Chinese Ethics, and so on, shows that the compilation of Gu Gang's Ancient History shows that he attaches importance to the identification and absorption of the philosophy that has arisen recently. The modern historiography thought of historiography and new knowledge theory of sociology also reflects the courage and difficulty of the academic context.
【作者单位】： 湖南图书馆历史文献部;
【分类号】：K092
，
本文编号：2178750
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2178750.html
