“华夷秩序”研究的历史演进及其启示
发布时间：2018-09-05 13:28
【摘要】：针对历史上曾长期主导东亚的华夷秩序,中外学者在研究方法和内容上存在着很大区别。从内容上讲,西方国家和日朝越等国学者分别从华夷秩序与西方关系、华夷秩序内部的华夷之辨角度来解释其历史逻辑。中国学者则经历了尊崇、质疑、否定到重建等不同阶段。从方法上看,历史学研究注重解释"是什么"的问题,而国际关系理论的研究则具有强烈的现实情怀,对史料的选择性使用也招来很多批判。通过梳理华夷秩序研究中的观点和方法,可以看出政治文化上高度的歧视性和统治结构的松散,形成华夷秩序内外部变化的重要线索。中国在参与和塑造未来国际和地区秩序的时候,也要与等级制的华夷观划清界限,坚持古典华夷秩序中宝贵的高度灵活的协商规范。
[Abstract]:Chinese and foreign scholars have great differences in research methods and contents in view of the long-term dominance of East Asia's order of China and Yi in history. In terms of content, scholars from Western countries, Japan, Korea, Vietnam and other countries explain their historical logic from the perspective of the relationship between the order of China and the West, and the differentiation of China and Yi within the order of China and Yi. Chinese scholars have gone through different stages, such as reverence, doubt, negation and reconstruction. From a methodological point of view, the study of history pays attention to the question of "what is", while the study of the theory of international relations has strong practical feelings, and the selective use of historical materials has attracted a lot of criticism. By combing the viewpoints and methods in the study of the order of China's Yi, we can see that the political culture is highly discriminatory and the ruling structure is loose, forming an important clue to the internal and external changes of the order of China's Yi and Yi. In participating in and shaping the future international and regional order, China should also draw a clear line with the hierarchical view of China's Yi, and adhere to the valuable and highly flexible negotiation norms in the classical order of China's Yi and Yi.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学政法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目(15FZZ012)
【分类号】：K06
[Abstract]:Chinese and foreign scholars have great differences in research methods and contents in view of the long-term dominance of East Asia's order of China and Yi in history. In terms of content, scholars from Western countries, Japan, Korea, Vietnam and other countries explain their historical logic from the perspective of the relationship between the order of China and the West, and the differentiation of China and Yi within the order of China and Yi. Chinese scholars have gone through different stages, such as reverence, doubt, negation and reconstruction. From a methodological point of view, the study of history pays attention to the question of "what is", while the study of the theory of international relations has strong practical feelings, and the selective use of historical materials has attracted a lot of criticism. By combing the viewpoints and methods in the study of the order of China's Yi, we can see that the political culture is highly discriminatory and the ruling structure is loose, forming an important clue to the internal and external changes of the order of China's Yi and Yi. In participating in and shaping the future international and regional order, China should also draw a clear line with the hierarchical view of China's Yi, and adhere to the valuable and highly flexible negotiation norms in the classical order of China's Yi and Yi.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学政法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目(15FZZ012)
【分类号】：K06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩东育;;“华夷秩序”的东亚构架与自解体内情[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
2 陈秀武;;论日本型华夷秩序的“虚像”[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
3 卢t，
本文编号：2224411
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2224411.html
