史实的构建:历史真理与理性差序
发布时间：2018-09-18 21:38
【摘要】：史家多强调历史叙事的真实。中国传统史家更秉持"实录"精神,但对"实录"内涵并无严格的逻辑界定。历史叙事是史学家从各种资料和证据中还原过去的事件,被还原的实情就是"史实"。史实可能无限接近事件原貌,但不等于客观事实,更不等于真理,因此,纯粹客观的历史记录是不存在的。不同学科的融合增加了史料和证据的可验证性以及历史叙事的客观性,史学观点和历史真理比自然科学受到的验证更多。就此而言,历史的边界在消失。基于历史的普适性,历史广泛地成为其他学科的基础和组成部分。由于人类理性差序,人们在一定阶段对客观世界的正确认识都是具体的、有条件限制的。每个人所获得的"历史真理"都是带有一定主观色彩的相对真理,对史学绝对真理的追求就是对相对真理无限扬弃的过程。
[Abstract]:Historians emphasize the truth of historical narration. Chinese traditional historians uphold the spirit of "record of truth", but there is no strict logical definition of the connotation of "record of truth". Historical narration is the historical fact that historians restore past events from all kinds of materials and evidence. Historical facts may be infinitely close to the original appearance of events, but they are not equal to objective facts, nor are they equal to truth. Therefore, pure objective historical records do not exist. The combination of different disciplines increases the verifiability of historical data and evidence and the objectivity of historical narration. In this sense, the boundaries of history are disappearing. Based on the universality of history, history has become the foundation and component of other disciplines. Due to the different order of human rationality, the correct understanding of the objective world is concrete and conditional at a certain stage. The "historical truth" obtained by everyone is the relative truth with certain subjective color, and the pursuit of the absolute truth of historiography is the process of sublation of the relative truth.
【作者单位】： 南京大学中华民国史中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基地重大招标项目(13JJD770014)资助
【分类号】：K03
本文编号：2249162
[Abstract]:Historians emphasize the truth of historical narration. Chinese traditional historians uphold the spirit of "record of truth", but there is no strict logical definition of the connotation of "record of truth". Historical narration is the historical fact that historians restore past events from all kinds of materials and evidence. Historical facts may be infinitely close to the original appearance of events, but they are not equal to objective facts, nor are they equal to truth. Therefore, pure objective historical records do not exist. The combination of different disciplines increases the verifiability of historical data and evidence and the objectivity of historical narration. In this sense, the boundaries of history are disappearing. Based on the universality of history, history has become the foundation and component of other disciplines. Due to the different order of human rationality, the correct understanding of the objective world is concrete and conditional at a certain stage. The "historical truth" obtained by everyone is the relative truth with certain subjective color, and the pursuit of the absolute truth of historiography is the process of sublation of the relative truth.
【作者单位】： 南京大学中华民国史中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基地重大招标项目(13JJD770014)资助
【分类号】：K03
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 于艳春;;浅谈「はず」与「わけ」的区别[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2006年05期
2 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2249162
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2249162.html
