范围、观念与标准——麦卡拉对安克斯密特叙事实体理论的全面质疑
发布时间：2018-10-15 06:39
【摘要】：弗兰克.安克斯密特在其《叙事的逻辑》一书中提出了叙事实体理论,其观点激进,学界对此褒贬不一,麦卡拉是最严厉的批评者。麦卡拉挑战叙事实体理论的适用范围,认为它并不适用于所有的历史撰述;质疑叙事观念论的合法性,认为它不足以支撑叙事实体;拷问衡量历史叙事优劣的标准,提出了相关性和可理解性作为客观性的重要补充。
[Abstract]:Frank Ankersmitt put forward the theory of narrative entity in his book the Logic of narration. His views are radical and the academic circles are different. McCarla is the harshest critic. McCara challenges the scope of application of narrative entity theory, considers that it does not apply to all historical narration, questions the legitimacy of narrative concept theory, thinks that it is not enough to support narrative entity, and interrogates the standard to measure the merits and demerits of historical narration. Relevance and comprehensibility are proposed as important complements to objectivity.
【作者单位】： 河南大学历史文化学院;河南大学世界历史研究所;中国社会科学院研究生院世界历史系;
【分类号】：K091
本文编号：2271689
[Abstract]:Frank Ankersmitt put forward the theory of narrative entity in his book the Logic of narration. His views are radical and the academic circles are different. McCarla is the harshest critic. McCara challenges the scope of application of narrative entity theory, considers that it does not apply to all historical narration, questions the legitimacy of narrative concept theory, thinks that it is not enough to support narrative entity, and interrogates the standard to measure the merits and demerits of historical narration. Relevance and comprehensibility are proposed as important complements to objectivity.
【作者单位】： 河南大学历史文化学院;河南大学世界历史研究所;中国社会科学院研究生院世界历史系;
【分类号】：K091
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭刚;;从“叙事实体”到“历史经验”——由安克斯密特看当代西方史学理论的新趋向[J];历史研究;2009年01期
2 周建漳;朱志杰;;历史叙述:从表现的观点看——安克斯密特“历史表现”观述评[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
3 张耕华;;历史的“硬性”与解释的“弹性”——兼论安克斯密特与扎戈林的争论[J];史学理论研究;2007年02期
4 王志华;;试析历史表现与认知的关系——兼论安克斯密特与扎密托的争论[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年01期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2271689
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2271689.html
