历史叙述之争与西方史学发展的波动:论尤里安之死
发布时间:2018-10-25 07:06
【摘要】:对于"叛教者"尤里安之死这一重要历史事件,基督徒与异教徒有着错综复杂且相互矛盾的叙述。这一历史叙述的争执实为基督教史学与传统古典史学间竞争和交融的缩影。基督教自身有着悠久的史学传统,在历史意识方面与古典史学迥异。但古典史学历经千年的繁荣发展,在史料分析、历史撰述与史学思想方面拥有无可置疑的优势。因此基督徒史家必然会继承与吸纳古典史学优秀传统,这对后世史学的发展有着深远的影响。
[Abstract]:Christians and heathen have a complicated and contradictory account of the important historical event of the death of Urienne the apostate. The dispute between Christian historiography and traditional classical historiography is a microcosm of this historical narrative. Christianity itself has a long history tradition and is different from classical historiography in the aspect of historical consciousness. But the classical historiography, after a thousand years of prosperity and development, has an indisputable advantage in historical data analysis, historical writing and historical thought. Therefore, Christian historians will inevitably inherit and absorb the excellent tradition of classical historiography, which has a profound influence on the development of later historiography.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学历史学系;
【分类号】:K091
[Abstract]:Christians and heathen have a complicated and contradictory account of the important historical event of the death of Urienne the apostate. The dispute between Christian historiography and traditional classical historiography is a microcosm of this historical narrative. Christianity itself has a long history tradition and is different from classical historiography in the aspect of historical consciousness. But the classical historiography, after a thousand years of prosperity and development, has an indisputable advantage in historical data analysis, historical writing and historical thought. Therefore, Christian historians will inevitably inherit and absorb the excellent tradition of classical historiography, which has a profound influence on the development of later historiography.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学历史学系;
【分类号】:K091
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈新;论20世纪西方历史叙述研究的两个阶段[J];史学理论研究;1999年02期
2 陈新;论历史性与历史叙述者[J];东南学术;1999年05期
3 陈新;论历史叙述研究中的历史事实概念[J];广东社会科学;1999年03期
4 易兰;历史叙述的客观与主观[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
5 李彪;;为历史叙述中的主观性而辩——以《大国的兴衰》为中心[J];湘潮(下半月)(理论);2009年11期
6 王伟;;历史叙述的限度[J];粤海风;2013年01期
7 陈新;论西方现代历史叙述范式的形成与嬗变[J];江西师范大学学报;1999年03期
8 姬春晖;;怎样看待历史叙述中的“虚构”——兼论历史与文学在“虚构”问题上的可类比性[J];郑州经济管理干部学院学报;2007年03期
9 周建漳;朱志杰;;历史叙述:从表现的观点看——安克斯密特“历史表现”观述评[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
10 吴晓群;;约瑟福斯的历史叙述[J];学术研究;2011年12期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 张W,
本文编号:2292993
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2292993.html