当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 史学理论论文 >

两种“兴味”与“晚年定论”——试说梁任公《中国近三百年学术史》的著述由来与意旨

发布时间:2019-05-11 08:24
【摘要】:向被视为《清代学术概论》姊妹篇的《中国近三百年学术史》,实为一未完成之作。就其在任公生前刊发的部分而言,对其著述背景的考察,可以窥见任公"政治兴味"对其学术活动的影响;对其言说对象的揭示,则可得见任公对其时甚为热烈的"整理国故"运动和"科玄论战"的见解;而于此种种不自觉和不得已中,任公自觉调整了对清代学术史内容和认识的叙述,堪称其对近三百年学术的"晚年定论"。
[Abstract]:The academic history of China, which is regarded as the sister of the academic introduction of Qing Dynasty, is an unfinished work. As far as the part published by Ren Gong before his death is concerned, the investigation of the background of his works can see the influence of Ren Gong's "political interest" on his academic activities. By revealing the object of his speech, we can see Ren Gong's views on the movement of "sorting out the past of the country" and the "debate on science and metaphysics" at that time. In all kinds of unconscious and last resort, Ren Gong consciously adjusted his narration of the content and cognition of the academic history of Qing Dynasty, which can be called his "final conclusion" of academic history in the past 300 years.
【作者单位】: 清华大学历史系;
【分类号】:K092


本文编号:2474339

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2474339.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户af4c2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com