《五代史志》与典制体通史的纂修

发布时间：2019-06-07 12:47

【摘要】：在纪传体"正史"中设立书志始于《史记》,《汉书》继之,至唐修《五代史志》,更标志着"正史"书志的发展趋于成熟和完善。《五代史志》主要反映了梁、陈、北齐、北周、隋五代典章制度的演变。同时在典制的叙述中,史家提出了对历史问题与社会问题的深刻见解:客观反映历史发展的新趋势,深入探讨经济政策与朝代兴亡之关系,重视揭露封建社会刑法的残酷性。这些成就构成典制体史书向前发展的动力。史学演进至中唐时期,无论是时代环境、政治发展的需要,还是史学自身重"通"的内在要求,都呼唤典制体通史的出世。而《五代史志》的修撰实践,恰好在编纂体例、著述旨趣、史料内容等方面为杜佑纂修《通典》开辟了道路。因而可以认为,《五代史志》在历史编纂上架设了一条从"正史"书志向典制体通史过渡的桥梁。
[Abstract]:The establishment of book chronicles in Ji Zhuan's official History began in Historical Records, followed by Han Shu, and was followed by Tang Dynasty revision of the Historical Records of the five dynasties, which marked the maturity and perfection of the Book Records of the official History. The Historical Records of the five dynasties mainly reflected Liang, Chen and Bei Qi. The Northern Zhou Dynasty, the Sui and five dynasties of the evolution of the system. At the same time, in the narration of the classical system, the historians put forward some profound opinions on historical and social problems: objectively reflecting the new trend of historical development, deeply discussing the relationship between economic policy and the rise and fall of the dynasty, and attaching importance to exposing the cruelty of the criminal law of feudal society. These achievements constitute the driving force for the development of canon history books. From the evolution of historiography to the middle Tang Dynasty, whether it is the environment of the times, the needs of political development, or the inherent requirements of historiography itself, it calls for the birth of the general history of canon. The practice of compiling the Historical Records of the five dynasties has just opened up the way for du you to compile the General Book in the aspects of compilation style, writing purport, historical material content and so on. Therefore, it can be considered that the Historical Records of the five dynasties built a bridge in the compilation of history from the book chronicle of the official history to the general history of the canonical system.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国历史编纂学的演进路径、优良传统和当代价值研究”阶段性成果。(项目号:09AZS001)
【分类号】：K092

【共引文献】