文化话语视角下的安全研究:以中国文化安全化为例

发布时间：2018-03-05 03:16

本文选题：安全研究　切入点：文化安全化　出处：《学术界》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：哥本哈根安全化理论拓展了冷战后安全研究阵营的空间,是近年来国际关系与安全研究领域中的主流学派,其提出的社会建构主义安全研究方法为当代安全研究提供了较为系统的研究路径,但也受到不同的质疑和挑战,比如在"成功的安全化"的界定上未能充分体现安全的主体间性和安全化的动态协商过程,同时缺乏一套连贯的分析框架。安全话语是一种文化话语,也是一种语境重构,从话语产生、话语协商与霸权、话语语境重构、话语实操四个层次来分析安全化过程,可将语言与社会动态语境结合起来,突出安全化动议的互文关系,体现安全化的动态协商过程,能更好地阐释中国的文化安全化。
[Abstract]:Copenhagen security theory has expanded the space of post-Cold War security research camp, and is the mainstream school in the field of international relations and security research in recent years. The research method of social constructivism security has provided a systematic research path for contemporary security research, but it has also been questioned and challenged by different countries. For example, the definition of "successful security" fails to fully reflect the inter-subjective nature of security and the dynamic negotiation process of security, and at the same time lacks a coherent analytical framework. Security discourse is not only a cultural discourse, but also a context reconstruction. Analyzing the process of security from the four levels of discourse generation, discourse negotiation and hegemony, discourse context reconstruction and discourse practice can combine language with social dynamic context and highlight the intertextuality of security motion. Reflecting the dynamic negotiation process of security, we can better explain the security of Chinese culture.
【作者单位】：厦门理工学院外国语学院;
【基金】：福建省哲学社会科学规划项目(FJ2015B253) 国家语委科研项目(YB125-155) 国家留学基金项目(CSC NO.201708350050) 福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才计划资助成果之一
【分类号】：G122

【相似文献】