从比较美学看中西日文化中的颜色
本文选题:比较美学 切入点:“光”色 出处:《社会科学论坛》2016年09期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:传统中西、中日色彩研究的主题集中在艺术史的技术比较层面,缺乏哲学美学理论化的比较视野。色彩源自视觉,又超越视觉,在中西日文化中表现为虚实合一的美的形式。西方之色重光,科学之光显理性,中国之色重"无",运"墨"而五色具,日本之色重"间",经验之"间"讲分寸。光之白从一到三(红黄蓝)到七应有尽有,光之无从零开始到零结束与虚无作伴。西方文化的白和黑隐含了实体与虚无的冲突,光的明暗交替通向已知和未知。中国文化纸为无,墨为有,虚实之间造分天地。墨由五色(焦、浓、重、淡、清)收拢为阴阳二气之色(黑白),最后氤氲成宇宙之气(无色),黑和白在有无相生中与文化的天道合一。日本之色以物色之色为色,自然之姿四季常新,视彩度的浓淡和亮度的深浅变幻而变幻自身,形成多色中内蕴一色,一色中含多色的间色。间色之"间"既是一种直观上的敏锐,又是一种经验上的分寸。间色区别于纯色,创造了彼此相间、取长补短的日本文化。
[Abstract]:In traditional Chinese and Western studies, the theme of color research between China and Japan is concentrated on the technical comparison level of art history, and lacks the comparative vision of philosophical aesthetics theorization. In the Japanese culture of China and the West, the form of beauty is the unity of vanity and reality. The color of the west is heavy with light, the light of science is rational, the color of China is heavy "nothing", and the color of "ink" is five colors. The color of Japan is heavy "between" and the "interval" of experience is measured. The white of light has everything from one to three (red, yellow and blue) to seven. There is no way for the light to start from zero to end with nothingness. The white and black of Western culture implies the conflict between substance and nothingness. The light of light alternately leads to the known and unknown. Chinese cultural paper is nothing, ink is there, and the world is divided between the false and the real. Ink is made from five colors (coke, thick, heavy, light, etc.). The color of Yin and Yang (black and white) is merged into the universe (colorless, black and white are in harmony with the culture of heaven and earth in the presence or absence of each other). The Japanese color is based on the seeking color, and the natural posture is always new in the four seasons. The intensity of the color and the depth of the brightness change and change itself, forming the same color in the multicolor. The "intercolor" in the monochromatic color is not only a kind of visual acuity, but also an experiential measure. The inter color is different from the solid color. To create a mutual and complementary Japanese culture.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学人文社会科学学院;
【分类号】:G04
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈伟;;中国比较美学:回顾与反思[J];学术月刊;2010年05期
2 陈伟;邵志华;;跨越性与可比性:比较美学的二维界说[J];江西社会科学;2010年07期
3 赵连元;比较美学发展前瞻[J];学习与探索;2000年04期
4 赵连元;;新世纪比较美学发展展望[J];文学前沿;2000年02期
5 邓军海;对中西比较美学的几点反思[J];文艺理论研究;2005年04期
6 管君章;;构建比较美学的方法论新探[J];艺术百家;2006年06期
7 多伊奇;季肇瑾;;比较美学的方法和意义[J];现代外国哲学社会科学文摘;1985年04期
8 吉冈健二郎 ,张新建;比较美学[J];文艺研究;1988年01期
9 周来祥 ,陈炎;比较美学的意义与方法[J];西北师大学报(社会科学版);1991年01期
10 刘伟林;21世纪:审美文化与比较美学[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);1997年02期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 古风;;21世纪:比较美学的世纪[A];春华秋实——江苏省美学学会(1981—2001)纪念文集[C];2001年
2 王杰;;在比较中确立理论立场——《中西比较美学大纲》读后[A];东方丛刊(1993年第4辑 总第七辑)[C];1993年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 曾军;翻译与比较美学[N];中国图书商报;2001年
2 杨自俭;一本值得推荐的译学著作[N];中国新闻出版报;2001年
3 蔚蓝;文学翻译中的审美比较与寻美探求[N];光明日报;2001年
,本文编号:1587523
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/1587523.html