民俗学学术伦理规范的善与恶

发布时间：2018-03-24 19:32

本文选题：民俗学　切入点：学术伦理规范　出处：《民族文学研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：民俗学学术伦理的具体规范,因不同的起源而呈现不同的性质。或者是从科学研究的特殊目的和认识形式反思地推论出来的假言命令的伦理规范;或者是从道德实践的根本目的和普遍原则直接地推论出来的定言命令的伦理规范。因此,为保证民俗学学术实践的道德正当性,就应当一方面自我限定其伦理规范在学科之内作为工具性特定手段的使用范围,另一方面又将伦理规范自觉地联结于学科之外的目的论普遍价值的判断标准。这样,民俗学学术伦理规范才可能转化其认识形式的"平庸之恶",在道德上成就学术实践的"平庸之善"。
[Abstract]:The specific norms of folklore academic ethics are different in nature because of their different origins, or the ethical norms of hypothetical commands inferred from the special purpose and cognitive form of scientific research; Or the ethical norms of definite orders derived directly from the fundamental purpose of moral practice and the universal principles. Therefore, in order to ensure the moral legitimacy of folklore academic practice, On the one hand, we should, on the one hand, define the scope of use of its ethical norms within the discipline as a tool and specific means, on the other hand, we should consciously link the ethical norms to the criteria for judging the universal value of teleology outside the discipline. Only in folklore academic ethics can it transform the "mediocre evil" of its cognitive form and achieve the "mediocre good" in its moral practice.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：K890

【相似文献】