晚期现代性时代的哲学——对马尔库什《文化、科学、社会》的反思

发布时间：2018-03-25 08:15

本文选题：艺术　切入点：文化　出处：《学术交流》2017年03期

【摘要】：马尔库什的(现代)文化哲学的一个核心观点是启蒙计划以深层的、明显不可解决的悖论(antinomies)而告终。但是,与大多数"后现代"思想家不同,马尔库什认为启蒙的承诺不能也不应该被放弃。这种张力存在于启蒙的失败与不能放弃启蒙的承诺之间,一方面启蒙想要创建自由的社会和平等的人,使每个人都能借助于理性高雅文化资源自律地生活,然而失败了;另一方面完全抛弃启蒙的承诺又是不可能的、不理想的,我们可以在马尔库什的"晚期现代性的悖论"中找到这种表述。本文对于马尔库什的概念进行了一种解释;认为马尔库什运用的"悖论"一词具有某种歧义性(在三种不同意义上的"矛盾对立"、"价值冲突"和"概念的非连贯性"之间来回摆动),同时指出马尔库什的追求与前两种意义一致,但是与第三种意义不一致,因此,第三种意义应该被抛弃。
[Abstract]:One of Markush's (modern) cultural philosophies is that the enlightenment program ended in the deep, apparently insoluble paradox of antinomies.However, unlike most "postmodern" thinkers, Markush believes that the promise of enlightenment cannot and should not be abandoned. This tension lies between the failure of enlightenment and its inability to give up the promise of enlightenment, which, on the one hand, seeks to create a free society and equal people. To enable everyone to live with self-discipline with the aid of rational and elegant cultural resources, but fails; on the other hand, it is impossible and not ideal to completely abandon the promise of enlightenment. We can find this expression in Markush's Paradox of late modernity. The author thinks that the word "paradox" used by Markush has some ambiguity (the contradiction and opposition in three different senses, "conflict of value" and "discontinuity of concept"), and points out the pursuit of Markush. In the same sense as the first two, But it is inconsistent with the third meaning, so the third meaning should be abandoned.
【作者单位】：布达佩斯中欧大学哲学与政治学院;黑龙江大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：黑龙江省高校基本科研业务费黑龙江大学专项资金项目“东欧新马克思主义的社会主义理论及其现实意义研究”(HDRC201610)
【分类号】：G02

【相似文献】