当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 文化论文 >

马尔库什的两个时期:延续抑或断裂

发布时间:2018-04-21 23:14

  本文选题:马尔库 + 澳大利亚大学 ; 参考:《学术交流》2017年03期


【摘要】:正青年马尔库什在研究中提出过这样的问题,卢卡奇两个时期是相互延续,还是彼此断裂?这个问题被提出来了,但是并没有得到最终的解答。现在我以同样的问题向马尔库什提出来。他自己从来没有这样提出过。他告诉我,在莫斯科和布达佩斯,他首先对现代科学哲学、语言哲学以及认识论感兴趣,还没有对文化更不要说对艺术理论感兴趣。只是到了澳大利亚,他才开始涉猎这些问题,然而那时因他所感兴趣的东西使他在澳大利亚大学里饱受折磨,因为没有人去探索文化。虽然他延续着以前,但是其著作显示出断裂,或者说至少显现出处所的变化,世界观的改变或者危机性。
[Abstract]:Markush, a young man, has raised the question of whether the two periods of Lukacs continue each other or break apart from each other. The question was raised, but no final answer was given. Now I put the same question to Markush. He had never made such a proposal himself. He told me that in Moscow and Budapest he was first interested in modern philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and epistemology, not yet in culture, let alone art theory. It was only when he arrived in Australia that he began to dabble in these problems, but at that time he was tortured in Australian universities by what he was interested in, because no one was going to explore culture. Although he continues his past, his books show a rupture, or at least a change in the place, a change in the worldview, or crisis.
【作者单位】: 四川大学文学与新闻学院;
【分类号】:G02

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 G.马尔库什;孙建茵;;马克思主义与文化理论[J];世界哲学;2010年02期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 孙建茵;论现代性文化及其悖论[D];黑龙江大学;2010年



本文编号:1784538

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/1784538.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户dc9e1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com