中国“文化研究”学科化问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 13:08

本文选题：文化研究 + 跨学科　；参考：《河北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：文化研究开始于上世纪50年代的英国,随着文化研究的不断反展,其影响力逐渐向外扩散。从20世纪80年代初开始,文化研究从英国先后传播到澳大利亚、美国乃至世界各地。1986年,美国学者弗里德利克·杰姆逊在北京大学的演讲是文化研究登陆中国的标志。然而,因为种种原因,一直到90年代文化研究才在中国成为一个学术热门。时至今日,文化研究在中国已经发展了三十年。文化研究具有跨学科、反学科的性质,但是不论是在西方还是在中国,文化研究的发展都呈现出学科化的趋势。文化研究是否应该学科化引起了人们的广泛争论,有人支持,也有人反对。事实上,不论人们争论与否,文化研究都已经出现学科化倾向。本文所论述的重点正是中国文化研究的学科化问题,旨在对中国文化研究的发展有些许帮助。本文总体分为三部分,第一部分主要论述文化研究的学科化矛盾及张力;第二部分主要是对中国文化研究发展状况的总结;第三部分主要分析中国文化研究学科化的发展困境以及对中国文化研究学科化发展出路的一些思考。第一部分首先分析“学科”、“跨学科”和“反学科”等概念。其次重点分析文化研究的跨学科旨趣。再次对西方文化研究的学科化现状简单总结分析。最后阐述文化研究学科化与反学科化之间的矛盾与张力。第二部分首先从社会背景和学术背景两方面分析文化研究在中国的具体语境。其次分类评述众多中国学者在文化研究学科化问题上的争论。最后总结中国文化研究的学科化现状。第三部分对于中国文化研究的发展困境,笔者在前人的基础上总结为三点,分别是文化研究的批判性危机、文化研究的身份认同危机和文化研究在体制内的自身建设问题。至于探究中国文化研究的出路,笔者只能说是一些力所能及的积极思考,但求可以有些微薄的作用。
[Abstract]:Cultural studies began in Britain in the 1950s. With the development of cultural studies, its influence gradually spread out. Since the early 1980s, cultural studies have spread from Britain to Australia, the United States and all over the world. In 1986, American scholar Friedrich Jefferson's speech at Peking University marked the landing of cultural studies in China. However, for various reasons, it was not until the 1990 s that cultural studies became an academic hot in China. Today, cultural studies have been developed in China for 30 years. Cultural research has the nature of cross-discipline and anti-discipline, but the development of cultural research shows the trend of discipline both in the west and in China. Whether the study of culture should be subject to discipline has aroused widespread debate, some people support and some people oppose. In fact, whether people argue or not, cultural research has a tendency to discipline. The emphasis of this paper is the subjectivization of Chinese cultural research, which is helpful to the development of Chinese cultural research. This paper is divided into three parts, the first part mainly discusses the contradiction and tension of the subject of cultural research, the second part is the summary of the development of Chinese cultural research. The third part mainly analyzes the dilemma of the development of Chinese cultural studies and some thoughts on the way out of the development of Chinese cultural studies. The first part analyzes the concepts of "discipline", "cross-discipline" and "anti-discipline". Secondly, it focuses on the cross-disciplinary purport of cultural research. Thirdly, it summarizes and analyzes the current situation of western cultural research. Finally, this paper expounds the contradiction and tension between discipline and anti-discipline in cultural studies. The second part analyzes the specific context of cultural research in China from two aspects: social background and academic background. Secondly, it classifies and comments on the controversy of many Chinese scholars on the subject of cultural studies. At last, it summarizes the present situation of Chinese cultural research. In the third part, the author summarizes the difficulties of the development of Chinese cultural research on the basis of the predecessors, namely, the critical crisis of cultural research, the identity crisis of cultural research and the self-construction of cultural research within the system. As for exploring the way out of Chinese cultural research, the author can only say that it is some positive thinking within the limits of capacity, but it can play a small role.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G0

【相似文献】