当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 文化论文 >

葛兰西文化领导权理论及其现实意蕴

发布时间:2018-07-02 23:13

  本文选题:葛兰西 + 文化领导权 ; 参考:《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:葛兰西的文化领导权思想在基于绝对的历史主义和实践一元论的视野中,囊括了“有机知识分子”的历史使命、“被压迫的社会群体”现实遭遇以及市民社会的葛氏转向等多个议题,为无产阶级革命领导权的获取与巩固提供了深层次的伦理道德的理论支撑与情感维系。应该注意到的是,葛兰西文化领导权在今天的研究重点,已经由从概念上的有机构成抑或其最终留下的结论到总体性的一个展开。因此,理论回到葛兰西并对葛兰西文化领导权思想完整把握,应该以总体性的理论视角与全面性的理论结构来重新审视它。论文首先在这个意义上,一方面,试图从总体性出发,以期在横向视角上从各个学科领域来把握文化领导权理论,同时在纵向视角上认为文化领导权既是先前一切文化渊薮的结果,也将会在自由王国中积极扬弃;另一方面,试图从全面性的理论视角来把握文化领导权理论来源、理论结构、理论特征以及关于践行难点的反思。其次,可以看到文化领导权思想经由葛兰西典范性的首创后,继而由阿尔都塞、普兰查斯、拉克劳、墨菲、哈贝马斯从阶级斗争、话语、商谈理论、日常生活、科学技术等等多个要素对其进行理论的丰富与完善,批判与扬弃,从而构成了葛兰西文化领导权在西方马克思主义传统中批判与演进的理论路向。可以说,西方马克思主义各个不同的学派对文化领导权思想的进一步说明与补充,使得文化领导权本身得到了极大的发展。最后,在对葛兰西文化领导权的理论图像与理论路向的完整说明以后,回顾中国的文化领导权建构的历程,可以发现我们国家的文化建设方面与葛兰西所提出的文化领导权的问题都坚信文化等意识形态建设越来越成为无产阶级政党的重要任务。众所周知,中国共产党人对文化建设的不断努力,使得文化等意识形态领导权不断地在历史的动态中得到平衡和巩固并在人民大众中凝聚成强烈的认同,从而为中国特色社会主义现代化的大踏步前进鸣锣开道。因此,论文的关键在于,以葛兰西的文化领导权思想为经,以文化领导权思想的理论路向为纬,以中国文化领导权建构为切入点,反思中国领导权建构的现实遭遇,并切中时弊地给出建设性的意见。
[Abstract]:In the view of absolute historicism and practical monism, Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership includes the historical mission of "organic intellectuals". The realistic encounter of the "oppressed social group" and the civil society's turn of Gehlet provide the theoretical support and emotional support for the acquisition and consolidation of the proletarian revolutionary leadership. It should be noted that the research focus of Gramsci's cultural leadership today has been expanded from the concept of organic composition or its final conclusion to the overall nature. Therefore, the return of the theory to Gramsci and the complete grasp of Gramsci's cultural leadership should be reexamined from the perspective of the overall theory and the comprehensive theoretical structure. First of all, in this sense, on the one hand, the thesis tries to start from the totality, in order to grasp the theory of cultural leadership from the perspective of various disciplines. At the same time, it is considered that cultural leadership is not only the result of all previous cultures, but also will be actively abandoned in the free kingdom. On the other hand, it tries to grasp the theoretical source and structure of cultural leadership from a comprehensive theoretical perspective. Theoretical characteristics and reflection on the difficulties of practice. Secondly, we can see that cultural leadership thought was first created by Gramsci, and then by Althusser, Prancas, Laclau, Murphy, Habermas from class struggle, discourse, negotiation theory, daily life. Many elements such as science and technology enrich and perfect the theory, criticize and sublate it, thus constitute the theoretical direction of the criticism and evolution of Gramsci's cultural leadership in the western Marxist tradition. It can be said that the different schools of Western Marxism further explain and supplement the thought of cultural leadership, which makes the cultural leadership itself greatly developed. Finally, after a complete explanation of the theoretical images and theoretical directions of Gramsci's cultural leadership, the author reviews the course of the construction of cultural leadership in China. It can be found that both the cultural construction of our country and the cultural leadership raised by Gramsci firmly believe that the construction of ideology such as culture is becoming an important task of the proletarian party. As we all know, the constant efforts of the Chinese Communists in cultural construction have made the leadership of ideology such as culture constantly balanced and consolidated in the dynamics of history and condensed into a strong identity among the masses of the people. Thus opening the way for the great strides forward of socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics. Therefore, the key of the thesis is to reflect on the realistic experience of the construction of Chinese cultural leadership by taking Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership as the classics, the theoretical direction of the thought of cultural leadership as the weft, and the construction of Chinese cultural leadership as the breakthrough point. At the same time, give constructive advice.
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G02

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 胡爱玲;;葛兰西对“意识形态”实践功能的阐释[J];郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年06期

2 孙晶;葛兰西的文化领导权思想[J];马克思主义研究;2002年03期

3 李知恕,黄金辉;葛兰西实践哲学述评[J];西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年05期

4 李佃来;葛兰西与当代市民社会理论传统[J];学术月刊;2004年01期

5 李佃来;哈贝马斯市民社会理论探讨[J];哲学研究;2004年06期

6 焦勇勤;葛兰西文艺思想评析[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2002年06期

7 孟繁华;大众文化与文化领导权[J];文艺争鸣;2005年03期

8 田时纲;;“egemonia”是“领导权”还是“霸权”——葛兰西政治理论的核心范畴[J];教学与研究;2007年08期

9 周凡;重读葛兰西的霸权理论[J];马克思主义与现实;2005年05期

10 李海青;;理想的公共生活如何可能——对“公共理性”的一种政治伦理学阐释[J];伦理学研究;2008年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 习近平;;在同全国劳动模范代表座谈时的讲话[N];人民日报;2013年



本文编号:2091279

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/2091279.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5ccb7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com