偏堡子文化与北沟文化研究
发布时间：2018-08-03 20:04
【摘要】：本文在全面回顾和系统总结前人研究的基础上，从出土材料出发，对偏堡子文化、北沟文化及二者之间的关系进行重新研究。 关于偏堡子文化，根据最新研究成果，本文赞成将其分为下辽河类型和辽东半岛类型两个地方类型和早、中、晚三期，从层位关系和横向关系两个方面确定了偏堡子文化的年代，大约处于公元前3000年—2500年。 关于北沟文化，本文通过对石佛山遗址出土遗存的进一步分析，将不属于北沟文化部分剔除，对北沟文化进行了重新界定，在此基础上将北沟文化分为早中晚三期，通过陶器的横向比较与碳十四检测，判定北沟文化的整体年代处于公元前2500—2000年之间。 关于二者之间的关系，本文通过年代衔接、器物组合、器表纹饰和典型陶器的比较，证明北沟文化晚于偏堡子文化，二者存在着明显的承袭关系。这种承袭关系表明，北沟文化是偏堡子文化的继承者，属于同一个文化系统。
[Abstract]:On the basis of comprehensive review and systematic summary of previous studies, this paper restudies the culture of Qianbao Zi, Beigou culture and their relationship from unearthed materials. Based on the latest research results, this paper is in favour of dividing the culture into two local types: the lower Liaohe type and the Liaodong Peninsula type, and the early, middle and late three periods. In this paper, the age of partial culture is determined from two aspects of horizon relation and horizontal relation, about 3000 BC to 2500 BC. As for Beigou culture, this paper, through further analysis of the remains unearthed from Shifu Mountain site, culls the part that does not belong to Beigou Culture, and redefines the Beigou Culture. On this basis, the Beigou Culture is divided into three phases: early, middle and late. Based on the horizontal comparison of pottery and C-14 detection, it is concluded that the whole age of Beigou culture is between 2500-2000 BC. As to the relationship between the two, this paper proves that the culture of Beigou is later than the culture of Qianbao by the comparison of age, combination of objects, ornaments and typical pottery, and there is an obvious inheritance relationship between the two. This kind of inheritance indicates that Beigou culture is the successor of Qianbao sub-culture and belongs to the same cultural system.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G122
本文编号：2162859
[Abstract]:On the basis of comprehensive review and systematic summary of previous studies, this paper restudies the culture of Qianbao Zi, Beigou culture and their relationship from unearthed materials. Based on the latest research results, this paper is in favour of dividing the culture into two local types: the lower Liaohe type and the Liaodong Peninsula type, and the early, middle and late three periods. In this paper, the age of partial culture is determined from two aspects of horizon relation and horizontal relation, about 3000 BC to 2500 BC. As for Beigou culture, this paper, through further analysis of the remains unearthed from Shifu Mountain site, culls the part that does not belong to Beigou Culture, and redefines the Beigou Culture. On this basis, the Beigou Culture is divided into three phases: early, middle and late. Based on the horizontal comparison of pottery and C-14 detection, it is concluded that the whole age of Beigou culture is between 2500-2000 BC. As to the relationship between the two, this paper proves that the culture of Beigou is later than the culture of Qianbao by the comparison of age, combination of objects, ornaments and typical pottery, and there is an obvious inheritance relationship between the two. This kind of inheritance indicates that Beigou culture is the successor of Qianbao sub-culture and belongs to the same cultural system.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G122
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李恭笃,高美璇;试论偏堡文化[J];北方文物;1998年02期
2 张翠敏;;论辽南地区偏堡类型因素[J];东北史地;2004年04期
3 许玉林;金石柱;;辽宁丹东地区鸭绿江右岸及其支流的新石器时代遗存[J];考古;1986年10期
4 许玉林;;辽宁东沟县石佛山新石器时代晚期遗址发掘简报[J];考古;1990年08期
5 陈全家;陈国庆;;三堂新石器时代遗址分期及相关问题[J];考古;1992年03期
6 许玉林;杨永芳;;辽宁岫岩北沟西山遗址发掘简报[J];考古;1992年05期
7 刘俊勇;王t};;辽宁大连市郊区考古调查简报[J];考古;1994年04期
8 苏小幸;王嗣洲;;辽东半岛新石器时代晚期文化的再认识[J];考古;1994年06期
9 郭大顺;马沙;;以辽河流域为中心的新石器文化[J];考古学报;1985年04期
10 王嗣洲,金志伟;大连北部新石器文化遗址调查简报[J];辽海文物学刊;1997年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 霍东峰;环渤海地区新石器时代考古学文化研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
，本文编号：2162859
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/2162859.html
