民国的招赘婚书与招赘婚诉讼——以龙泉司法档案为中心的研究

发布时间：2018-02-08 14:54

本文关键词： 招赘婚龙泉司法档案婚书民国　出处：《政法论坛》2014年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：招赘婚在传统时代为礼法所讳言,明清律例中的相关内容仅有寥寥数语。清末法律改革取消了招赘婚的概念。北洋时期的大理院则通过解释例和判决例,使招赘婚中相关权利义务的法律解释走向完备。在1930年《中华民国民法》中,受男女平等等理念的指导,招赘婚被视同普通婚姻,民间招赘婚中的特殊权利和义务关系,仍然以婚书契约做约定。新发现的龙泉司法档案显示,虽然法律历经变革,民间招赘婚的形式和内容却几乎没有改变。婚书所表现出来的这种"稳定性",反映了现实社会中的民事关系。面对婚书契约与法律之间的矛盾,地方司法机关针对不同的情况灵活处理,国民政府也通过判例和司法解释补充和修正法律,以回应社会实际的法律需求。
[Abstract]:In the traditional times, it was denied by the Rite Law that there were only a few words in the laws and regulations of the Ming and Qing dynasties. The legal reform in the late Qing Dynasty abolished the concept of accepting redundant marriage. The Dali Yuan in the Beiyang period adopted the interpretation and judgment examples. In 1930, in the Civil Law of the Republic of China, guided by the idea of equality between men and women, forced marriage was regarded as the special right and obligation relationship between ordinary marriage and folk marriage. The newly discovered Longquan judicial file shows that although the law has undergone changes, However, the form and content of the folk marriage has hardly changed. The "stability" of the marriage document reflects the civil relations in the real society, and faces the contradiction between the marriage contract and the law. The local judicial organs deal with the different situations flexibly, and the national government supplements and amends the laws through jurisprudence and judicial interpretation in order to respond to the actual legal needs of the society.
【作者单位】：浙江大学人文学院历史系;浙江大学历史系人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“民国地方司法实践与社会变迁研究”(10BZS032);国家社会科学基金重大项目“龙泉司法档案整理与研究”(13&ZD151)的阶段性成果浙江省社科规划课题《清代以来浙南山区的宗族:观念、惯例和司法——以民国龙泉地方法院档案为中心的研究》(09CGLS001Z) 浙江大学光华法学院龙泉司法档案专项课题研究经费资助
【分类号】：D929;K258;G275.1

【参考文献】