中国知青研究的学科定位及其理论建设的若干问题

发布时间：2018-03-20 14:12

本文选题：中国知青研究　切入点：学科定位　出处：《中共党史研究》2014年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国知青研究是既关乎历史又关联当下以及关系未来的重大课题。知青研究要"突破瓶颈",首先在学科定位上应进入历史学轨道,即标树以史料开发和史实重建为中心的研究进路,构建以问题解答为中心的研究框架。中国知青运动脱胎于"文化大革命"的政治路线,故有"政治运动史"的研究框架;同时,在更广阔的内容和事实的层面上,与知青的"生产—生活—生存"息息相关,故有"社会生活史"的研究框架。两者交叉、渗透,后者更基础更富有弹性,故知青研究应确立以社会生活史研究为主导的"双重框架论"。关于"知青与知青运动分开"的讨论,是极具挑战性的学术命题,据此可引申、辨析、回答许多相关问题。
[Abstract]:The study of educated youth in China is an important subject related to history, the present and the future. In order to "break through the bottleneck", the study of educated youth should first enter the track of history in terms of the orientation of the subject. That is to say, the standard tree takes the development of historical materials and the reconstruction of historical facts as the research approach, and constructs a research framework centered on the solution of questions. The Chinese educated youth movement was born out of the political line of the "Cultural Revolution", so it has the research framework of "the History of political Movement"; At the same time, on a broader content and factual level, it is closely related to the "production-life-survival" of educated youth, so there is a research framework of "social life history." the two intersect and penetrate, and the latter is more basic and flexible. Therefore, the study of educated youth should establish a "double frame theory", which is dominated by the study of social life history. The discussion on the separation of educated youth from educated youth movement is a challenging academic proposition, which can be extended, analyzed and answered many related questions.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院历史研究所;
【分类号】：K273

【共引文献】