圆明园为中国奸民焚掠说辨析

发布时间：2018-04-08 21:36

本文选题：圆明园　切入点：中国奸民　出处：《北京社会科学》2017年08期

【摘要】：关于圆明园惨遭焚毁的原因,史学界历来都是众说纷纭,莫衷一是。其中的"中国奸民焚掠说",不但有些外国侵略者持此观点,一些清代的学者文人也有这一方面的记载,但并未得到历史学者认同。然而近年,不断有人撰文,特别是网上的许多文章,多将圆明园的焚毁完全归咎于中国的奸民。经过爬梳相关史料,认为需要明确:所谓圆明园为中国奸民焚掠的说法是错误的,必须厘清事实,修正错误,以正视听。
[Abstract]:The historical circle has always had different opinions about the cause of Old Summer Palace being burned down.Not only some foreign invaders hold this view, but some scholars in Qing Dynasty also have records of this aspect, but they are not recognized by historians.In recent years, however, more and more articles, especially on the Internet, have blamed Old Summer Palace's incineration entirely on Chinese adulterers.After combing through the relevant historical data, the author thinks that it is wrong to say that Old Summer Palace burned and plundered for the Chinese adulterers, and must clarify the facts and correct the mistakes in order to correct the situation.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K252

【相似文献】